Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Latest Research In Climate Science
- UK Sucking Carbon
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
Recent Comments
- arn on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- gordon vigurs on Latest Research In Climate Science
- gordon vigurs on UK Sucking Carbon
- Bob G on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Tel on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Tel on UK Sucking Carbon
- william on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Bob G on UK Net Zero
- arn on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- conrad ziefle on One Year Left To Save The Planet
I think we need to believe them. After all, their predictions have been spot on in the past.
Oh no! woe is me, woe is me and thrice woe is me….
It is so bad!
Worse than we thought!
The AGW catastrophists are on the news and, and …..
Woe, woe, and more woe! The five horseman of the IPCC pox have spoken….
Life is a terminal affliction! And CO2 is the enemy…
_______________________________________________________________
This report is so vapid that it demands a comedy spoof, where are the comedy writers when we need them?
Meanwhile on the other channel there’s sport …
So Hansen made the cover. Good for him.
With this much ice, I’m expecting a cold winter in Australia.
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/S_stddev_timeseries.png
How do earlier years compare? If it’s a really cold winter, I think I’ll fly North.
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/temp/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=meananom&year=1978&month=8&period=3month&area=nat
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/rain/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=percent&year=1978&month=8&period=3month&area=nat
I doubt there is any correlation between BOM mean winter temps or rainfall in Australia and winter sea ice extent in Antarctica as measured by NSIDC.
But if the winter is cold, I’m going to north to Thailand.
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/temp/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=minextrm/low&period=3month&area=nat&year=1981&month=8&day=31
Actually, I’ll correct myself. The Australian lowest minimums in winter do correlate with excessive Antarctic sea ice extent, while the mean temp anomaly does not. Very interesting.
Not unless there is a bit of house cleaning at BOM. link
I agree. The BOM will likely say its the hottest Aussie winter ever, when actually the peons will likely be freezing our little arses off.
Apart from tomorrow’s weather, it’s hard to believe anything the BOM publishes anymore.
OT
Is the BHO administtration handing out tax credits to companies that promote the AGW scare? First Chipotle now this.
http://www.dailyclimate.org/tdc-newsroom/2014/03/major-league-baseball-bats
It is enough to fool the currenty US administration.
This is not a 1 april prank:
Here are some facts that do meet the claims: Inhofe, Defense budget used by Obama as his climate change sludge fund. US West Coast no longer defended against incoming missiles from Russia and Iran, defense capability seriously undermined by scrapping perfectly functioning systems but hey, we now have solar panels.: http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/04/01/Inhofe-Warns-Georgia-Moldova-Next-for-Russia-Attacks-Obama-for-Eliminating-Weapon-Systems
Impeach the hack.
But isn’t the IPCC just one long continuing April Fools’ joke?
I’m indebted to robbcab for this –
“The release of the AR5 WGII SPM got me thinking and looking back through the older reports.
Take a peek at this: http://bit.ly/1mIpjmY
I decided to go all the way back to 1988 and look at the Hansen et al paper that “started it all” and compare his projections for both low-emission and high-emission scenarios (kind of like Steve Goddard has been doing).”
from http://suyts.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/more-contemptible-lying-bullhit-from-the-ipcc/#comment-131982