Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- Billyjack on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- conrad ziefle on “pushing nature past its limits”
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- John Francis on Mission Accomplished
- Mike on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
I think we need to believe them. After all, their predictions have been spot on in the past.
Oh no! woe is me, woe is me and thrice woe is me….
It is so bad!
Worse than we thought!
The AGW catastrophists are on the news and, and …..
Woe, woe, and more woe! The five horseman of the IPCC pox have spoken….
Life is a terminal affliction! And CO2 is the enemy…
_______________________________________________________________
This report is so vapid that it demands a comedy spoof, where are the comedy writers when we need them?
Meanwhile on the other channel there’s sport …
So Hansen made the cover. Good for him.
With this much ice, I’m expecting a cold winter in Australia.
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/S_stddev_timeseries.png
How do earlier years compare? If it’s a really cold winter, I think I’ll fly North.
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/temp/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=meananom&year=1978&month=8&period=3month&area=nat
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/rain/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=percent&year=1978&month=8&period=3month&area=nat
I doubt there is any correlation between BOM mean winter temps or rainfall in Australia and winter sea ice extent in Antarctica as measured by NSIDC.
But if the winter is cold, I’m going to north to Thailand.
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/temp/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=minextrm/low&period=3month&area=nat&year=1981&month=8&day=31
Actually, I’ll correct myself. The Australian lowest minimums in winter do correlate with excessive Antarctic sea ice extent, while the mean temp anomaly does not. Very interesting.
Not unless there is a bit of house cleaning at BOM. link
I agree. The BOM will likely say its the hottest Aussie winter ever, when actually the peons will likely be freezing our little arses off.
Apart from tomorrow’s weather, it’s hard to believe anything the BOM publishes anymore.
OT
Is the BHO administtration handing out tax credits to companies that promote the AGW scare? First Chipotle now this.
http://www.dailyclimate.org/tdc-newsroom/2014/03/major-league-baseball-bats
It is enough to fool the currenty US administration.
This is not a 1 april prank:
Here are some facts that do meet the claims: Inhofe, Defense budget used by Obama as his climate change sludge fund. US West Coast no longer defended against incoming missiles from Russia and Iran, defense capability seriously undermined by scrapping perfectly functioning systems but hey, we now have solar panels.: http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/04/01/Inhofe-Warns-Georgia-Moldova-Next-for-Russia-Attacks-Obama-for-Eliminating-Weapon-Systems
Impeach the hack.
But isn’t the IPCC just one long continuing April Fools’ joke?
I’m indebted to robbcab for this –
“The release of the AR5 WGII SPM got me thinking and looking back through the older reports.
Take a peek at this: http://bit.ly/1mIpjmY
I decided to go all the way back to 1988 and look at the Hansen et al paper that “started it all” and compare his projections for both low-emission and high-emission scenarios (kind of like Steve Goddard has been doing).”
from http://suyts.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/more-contemptible-lying-bullhit-from-the-ipcc/#comment-131982