Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
Recent Comments
- John Francis on UK Officially Sucks
- David M Kitting on UK Officially Sucks
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
- Reid on UK Officially Sucks
- Billyjack on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Bob G on UK Officially Sucks
- Russell Cook on UK Officially Sucks
- Margaret Smith on UK Officially Sucks
- gordon vigurs on UK Officially Sucks
IPCC Releases Their April Fools Day Report, With A Grave Warning
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
I think we need to believe them. After all, their predictions have been spot on in the past.
Oh no! woe is me, woe is me and thrice woe is me….
It is so bad!
Worse than we thought!
The AGW catastrophists are on the news and, and …..
Woe, woe, and more woe! The five horseman of the IPCC pox have spoken….
Life is a terminal affliction! And CO2 is the enemy…
_______________________________________________________________
This report is so vapid that it demands a comedy spoof, where are the comedy writers when we need them?
Meanwhile on the other channel there’s sport …
So Hansen made the cover. Good for him.
With this much ice, I’m expecting a cold winter in Australia.
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/S_stddev_timeseries.png
How do earlier years compare? If it’s a really cold winter, I think I’ll fly North.
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/temp/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=meananom&year=1978&month=8&period=3month&area=nat
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/rain/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=percent&year=1978&month=8&period=3month&area=nat
I doubt there is any correlation between BOM mean winter temps or rainfall in Australia and winter sea ice extent in Antarctica as measured by NSIDC.
But if the winter is cold, I’m going to north to Thailand.
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/temp/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=minextrm/low&period=3month&area=nat&year=1981&month=8&day=31
Actually, I’ll correct myself. The Australian lowest minimums in winter do correlate with excessive Antarctic sea ice extent, while the mean temp anomaly does not. Very interesting.
Not unless there is a bit of house cleaning at BOM. link
I agree. The BOM will likely say its the hottest Aussie winter ever, when actually the peons will likely be freezing our little arses off.
Apart from tomorrow’s weather, it’s hard to believe anything the BOM publishes anymore.
OT
Is the BHO administtration handing out tax credits to companies that promote the AGW scare? First Chipotle now this.
http://www.dailyclimate.org/tdc-newsroom/2014/03/major-league-baseball-bats
It is enough to fool the currenty US administration.
This is not a 1 april prank:
Here are some facts that do meet the claims: Inhofe, Defense budget used by Obama as his climate change sludge fund. US West Coast no longer defended against incoming missiles from Russia and Iran, defense capability seriously undermined by scrapping perfectly functioning systems but hey, we now have solar panels.: http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/04/01/Inhofe-Warns-Georgia-Moldova-Next-for-Russia-Attacks-Obama-for-Eliminating-Weapon-Systems
Impeach the hack.
But isn’t the IPCC just one long continuing April Fools’ joke?
I’m indebted to robbcab for this –
“The release of the AR5 WGII SPM got me thinking and looking back through the older reports.
Take a peek at this: http://bit.ly/1mIpjmY
I decided to go all the way back to 1988 and look at the Hansen et al paper that “started it all” and compare his projections for both low-emission and high-emission scenarios (kind of like Steve Goddard has been doing).”
from http://suyts.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/more-contemptible-lying-bullhit-from-the-ipcc/#comment-131982