How would things have been different at Sandy Hook if the principal had her own rifle, and the children didn’t have to wait 15 minutes for someone else with a gun to show up?
Warning : this question may cause progressive brains to explode.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Climate Of 1923
- Market Volatility
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
- Fort Lauderdale Drowning
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Expert Arctic Forecasting
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Nobel Prize Winning Forecast
- Changing Climate
- Gen Z Math And Solutions
- Orwellian NASA Maps
- Faking US Temperature Data
Recent Comments
- arn on Market Volatility
- arn on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Bill on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on Market Volatility
- conrad ziefle on Hottest Summer Ever
- stewartpid on Market Volatility
- William on Record CO2 Growth
- Greg in NZ on Hottest Summer Ever
Better yet, if the entire staff were armed.
If you arm the entire staff of every school in the US then you will get a steady trickle of people shot throughout the year.
Everyone around here is armed, and no one gets shot – except by nutcases dressed in blue uniforms.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Yea, but you are not a bunch of NEA nuts either.
Hey Andy! Yep, once upon a time when everyone had cars, they just started running each other down. I guess that’s why we banned cars.
[citation needed]
I won’t hold my breath. I know the statistics. You’re talking out of your posterior (or being sarcastic).
If you claim that “arming the entire staff of every school in the US then you will get a steady trickle of people shot throughout the year”,
then you will get a steady trickle of comments telling you that you are an idiot throughout the year
I can hear them screaming: “Ban assault tricksy questions from deniers! They’re not fair!”
More like: “they’re committing a crime against humanity by asking tricky questions”.
Cops outside writing speeding tickets (22 MPH in a 20 MPH zone) makes money
Cops inside protecting our most precious commodity costs money
I find Sandy Hook one of the creepiest events in the last 5-10 years.
No reports of burial services, no pictures. Surprising number of Screen Actors Guild members among the “parents”, “school officials”, and “police” on scene. The NSA “school lock-down exercise” that just happened to have taken place in the same small town earlier in the day. The camo-wearing rifle-toter who was observed leaving the school and disappearing in the woods. The bizarre on-camera interview with the “investigator” who entered the room laughing and smiling, and then spontaneously donned his frowny-face when the interview began.
The discrepancies in the reports of Adam Lanza’s weaponry – guns or rifles? Where is the physical evidence collected on the scene? Our website host (SG) was all over these “anomalies” at the time, and none has been adequately explained
Remember the Jersey Girls of 9/11? The widows of World Trade Center workers who died in the attack and building collapses. They became media darlings and pretty much skewed the legislative response to the event, and were richly rewarded for their efforts (not questioning their motives, but they served a purpose of advancing an agenda against Bush). And they were heavily Democrats.
So, where are the grieving parents of Sandy Hook today?
Where are the graves of the child victims?
Where is the definitive evidence that, in fact, ANYBODY ACTUALLY DIED at Sandy Hook?
Just wonderin’ … … … …
This is a bit of a swerve, but rather than respond directly, let me speak in more general terms. What does it say when the popular media is so untrusted that we even have to consider such questions? Was there a mass shooting at Sandy Hook? Was 9-11 an inside job? How about Iraq and the WMDs? Is CAGW a real threat? Is the unemployment level really at 7%? Is Obama an natural born citizen? Is consumer price inflation really at 2%? Is the national debt really at $14T?
Popular media will tell you that all these questions are conspiracy based, tin foil hat subjects — and yet we know from personal experience that we are being fed an unending stream of lies on at least some of these things. Anyone who lives in the real world knows with certainty that price inflation is much higher than reported. Anyone who speaks with friends knows that unemployment is higher than reported. Anyone who looks at actual data knows that the CAGW scare is a hoax. Saying that does not make me a conspiracy nut; it makes me a truth teller.
Bottom line: The mass media is completely untrustworthy. We know that from our own first hand experience. Do they tell the truth about anything? We have no way of knowing; maybe they do, maybe not, but if they do we cannot sort it out from the lies. All we can say with certainty is that whatever they tell us, the information falls into the category of (at best) completely unverified assertions from a known bad source.
Yes the mass media is completely untrustworthy. They are the propaganda outlet for our masters and have been for a hundred years.
I caught them lying big time when they framed the Kent State Riot protesters as “Vietnam Protesters” (It was actually about retired military on the GI bill being denied voting rights by the town) and then completely fabricated a ‘Riot’ at a very quiet Big Ten University, complete with film footage that was shown nationwide except in the state where the University was located. This was to protect the National Guard that fired on and killed the protesters from the court of public opinion.
MORE
Bottom Line: The Media is completely untrustworthy
But knowing that is half the battle. Knowing WHY they are untrustworthy is the other half. Once you know those 2 things, you can then discern what is true and what is not. You do not have to doubt everything. just that which does not fit into the “why”.
http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=vcsr&GSvcid=345407
Nobody died at Sandy Hook. Government conspiracies are not theoretical, they are hard fact, proven over and over again for centuries. If you like your government narrative, you can keep your government narrative. But nobody died at Sandy Hook.
All I believe is that the news media is 100% propaganda.
My husband’s family have been newspapermen for generations. My Father-in-law said point blank the only thing you can trust in a newspaper are the sports scores (The Mafia would have your head if you screwed them up no doubt.)
The only papers he considered reasonable were the Wall Street Journal and the Christian Science Monitor and that was 25 years ago.
The IBD is pretty good. This is one of their stories:
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/042810-531731-the-10-trillion-climate-fraud.htm?ntt=10%20trillion
You do have to wonder why we have surveillance footage of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold from 1999 and nothing from the lone killer in 2013. To this day on you tube you can see the Columbine killers walking through the hallway. Sandy Hook had absolutely no school surveillance in 2013?