On March 19, 1907 – three HCN stations in Oklahoma were over 100 degrees. If this happened now, climate experts would cite it as 100% proof of global warming, and James Hansen would say it couldn’t have happened below 350 PPM CO2.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “The Floridian quakes with apprehension”
- Milton Propaganda
- “Yes … definitely”
- “Antarctica has turned green”
- Rapidly Intensifying Hurricanes
- Kamala Can Prevent Hurricanes
- The Ultimate Global Warming Test
- “ready for the next one”
- Combining Science And Religion
- 500 Million Years Of Warmer Temperatures
- “Arctic sea ice is headed toward a historic low”
- “Record winter low”
- Kamala Planning Another Half Trillion Dollars For Ukraine
- “the science is absolutely certain”
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
Recent Comments
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on “Yes … definitely”
- Robertvd on “The Floridian quakes with apprehension”
- Bob G on Milton Propaganda
- Greg in NZ on “The Floridian quakes with apprehension”
- Bill on Milton Propaganda
- Francis Barnett on “The Floridian quakes with apprehension”
- Patrick Powers on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Gordon Vigurs on Milton Propaganda
- Bob G on “The Floridian quakes with apprehension”
- Bob G on Milton Propaganda
Steve, you should switch to Centigrades since below 0 means cold and above zero warmer. Further from zero is either much warmer or much colder and this is why the chemistry uses C as a standard – you either have to cool reaction or warm it.
Washington, DC also set their all-time March record during 1907, 93 degrees. With National Airport so hot biased, if it were to happen now, it woud probably be 98.
Reblogged this on Help save our kids future.
Steve, you remind me of Haidt’s finding that conservatives find it easy to predict what liberals will do or say, but liberals are generally wildly wrong about conservatives, because they depend on stereotypes and caricatures. Fundamentally, liberals have only 2 values (fairness and avoiding harm), while conservatives have those and about 4 more, so they can easily predict the sub-set.