My focus is normally on data tampering to the US temperature record, but our friends at NOAA and NASA have been equally busy tampering with the global temperature record. They did a huge amount of damage to global temperatures prior to 2001, but the graph below just shows the post-2001 tampering.
Note that in the 2001 version, there was a little over 0.3C warming from 1940 to 2000, and now there is almost 0.6 warming during that same time period.
2001 version : wayback.archive.org/……./FigA.txt
2014 version : data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A.txt
They accomplished this spectacular feat of data corruption, through an impressive hockey stick of cooling the past and warming the present.
Please tell me there are some lawyers in the USA getting to work on this.
No, the lawyers, politicians and pseudo-scientists are all on the same sinking ship, trapped like rats!
Unfortunately, too true.
Steven Goddard has the wit and the courage to pull the plug on the unholy alliance of cowards forged by CHAOS and FEAR of nuclear annihilation in late Aug 1945:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf
Before pulling the plug, they should be offered safe passage and public forgiveness if they stop the deceit immediately.
I followed your links and verified the claim. A truly, in your face, brazen rewriting of historical data.
Tampering of sea level data is just as outrageous.
Archive that wayback data!!!
They were blind to it.
Now they’ll request that it be deleted from the archive to keep the scam alive!!
I have saved a copy and I know that E.M Smith will have achives over at https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2014/07/22/gistemp-who-needs-antarctic-data-or-temps-near-ice/
Uh oh … there could be ‘trouble with this …
I [NASA] Will Not Be Shut Down from the movie “Virtuosity”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fs1k0EMYydY
.
Add to that what E.M. Smith has shown about GISS code does not processing any temperature data near polar sea ice.
See https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2014/07/22/gistemp-who-needs-antarctic-data-or-temps-near-ice/
A very murky picture of data selection, tampering, and subtitution is being revealed.
As I originally put it GISS = Guessed Input Sample Synthesizer ?
I’ll have to change that to GISS = Guessed Input Sample Substituter. 🙂
There had already been remarkable changes pre-2001, see e.g. here:
http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/23/hansen-then-and-now/
Hansen et al. (1981)
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf
“A remarkable conclusion from Fig 3 is that the global temperature is almost as high today [1980] as it was in 1940. The common misconception that the world is cooling is based on NH experience to 1970. Another conclusion is that global surface air temperature rose ~0.4 deg C in the past century [1880-1980], roughly consistent with calculated CO2 warming.”
BTW, there are some older data sets (e.g., old versions of CRUTEMP) preserved here:
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/
The Odumbo regime are lying scum. Don’t blame me. I voted for an American.
Unfortunately it far deeper that that most of the bureaucracy is inhabited by progressive, it matters little whom is in the White house, the only difference is the administration for what they are doing or against. In Odumbo case he for it.
Actually the bureaucracy is owned by the crony corporatists. That is why they write piles and piles of regulations that are enforced on the Mom & Pop businesses but not on the big boys.
If it wasn’t so late, I might have the energy to dig up the background material to support that but I do not feel like posting 10 to 20 pages.
“Note that in the 2001 version, there was a little over 0.3C warming from 1940 to 2000, and now there is almost 0.6 warming during that same time period.”
Properly worded so as to be more accurate: “Note that in the 2001 version, there was a little under 0.4C warming, and now there is just under 0.5 warming during that same time period.”
You don’t want to mislead the reader, do you?
You’re confusing the trend line with the temperature, sweetie.
Thank you and so I was. So, now, here is the way it should read:
“Note that in the 2001 version, there was a little over 0.4C warming from 1940 to 2000, and now there is 0.6C warming during that same period.”
and don’t call me sweetie unless you want your dick removed from your flussig.
Now sugarpie, I’m sure no one with half a brain cell would ever consider you to be a real sweetie. Sweetie was just a polite euphemism for something Toto would be obligated to edit out.
I’m sure you can figure-out the real meaning on your own….
Why would a simple modification to correct an honest mistake bring about hostility on his or your part? It’s simple to see who has the problem. And no, tomo nothing said on this forum ‘upsets’ me as much as you would like it to.
Whatever. You’re illiterate & you know it. Clap your hands, sweetie.
@Stark Dickflüssig
you’ve upset the little pescy darling.
Easy, boys. What would you do if you didn’t have pesce to kick around any more …
Leave them alone, CO. Let them think it bothers me.
Well now, I’m fairly sure sugarpie would sashay off to somewhere where it can get more attention.
Sugarpie just can’t get enough of that.
They don’t think it bothers you. They think you crave it.
Wrong again. They (or you) can’t comment when proven wrong so yname call.
Of course people can be wrong. I was just pointing out what I think they think.
For myself—and the merit of your arguments notwithstanding—I liked your briefly appearing other persona better:
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/08/03/co2-is-forcing-polar-bears-to-learn-to-surf/#comment-400111