1971 Stunner : NASA And NCAR Knew That Catastrophic Global Warming Was A Farce

In 1971, NASA and NCAR’s top climatologists knew that even a massive increase in atmospheric CO2 would produce less than 2 degrees warming. The entire basis of the catastrophic global warming scam has been known to be a fraud from day one.

2015-11-07-12-30-092015-11-07-12-30-39

http://vademecum.brandenberger.eu/pdf/klima/rasool_schneider_1971.pdf failed to load

This is consistent with what radiative transfer models and satellite temperatures show. Without NASA and NOAA data tampering, the entire scam would have collapsed a decade ago.

h/t to Marc Morano

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to 1971 Stunner : NASA And NCAR Knew That Catastrophic Global Warming Was A Farce

  1. Tab Numlock says:

    .+2 sounds lovely. But we’ll probably only see +1 and never know it since it would be swamped by natural fluctuation. Temps will soon drop an average of -6 for the next 100k years when the current interglacial ends. We’ll notice that and the mile thick ice overhead.

  2. Rud Istvan says:

    This find is highly relevant to the NYAG Exxon fishing expedition inspired by Oreskes and gang. Please make sure the info gets to Exxon. Maybe even to Schneiderman.

  3. chris y says:

    But it gets better.

    That same paper focused on the effects of aerosols on global cooling. Although he was not a co-author, a NASA scientist provided critical modeling tools for the aerosol effects. He was acknowledged several times in the references of the paper.

    His name is Dr. James Hansen. Perhaps you have heard of him?

    “16. J. E. Hansen, personal communication. We are indebted to Dr. Hansen for making these Mie scattering calculations for us, for suggesting the use of the two-stream approximation, and for checking the fluxes obtained by the two-stream approximation against some exact solutions (which agree to within about 5 percent) to the multiple scattering problem (see, for example, J. E. Hansen, Astrophy. J. 155, 565 (1969).”

    “26. We again thank Dr. J. E. Hansen for his many contributions. The work was done while S.H.S. held a NAS-NRS resident research associateship at the Institute for Space Studies, Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA.”

    Why would Hansen help out with a global cooling paper in high-impact Science magazine, when he built his career on catastrophic global warming from CO2?

  4. Jimmy Haigh says:

    There’s a problem with the URL.

  5. John F. Hultquist says:

    I agree with what Rud said.

    ——————–Also,
    I wonder if they now know the kelvin is not referred to or typeset as a degree.
    Oh well, anomalies should be typeset as C. degrees, not degrees C., and no one pays any attention to that either.

  6. Felix says:

    One paper from 1971? That’s what you have? For the history of the science of climate change see: https://www.aip.org/history/climate/index.htm

    • tonyheller says:

      Only a complete moron would take total empirical failure of a theory as being “one paper”

    • Aztecbill says:

      There is a lot more than that. In 1974 the CIA conducted the first gathering of scientists concerned about climate change. Their paper concluded that they all agreed that the climate was indeed changing – it was getting cooler. Warmists like to push the idea that global warming was the default position of scientists since before 1900. It is not the case.

  7. Stephen Richards says:

    Well found Marc M and Tony H. This is incredible but not unbelievable

  8. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    So in 1971 Stephen Schneider’s value for ECS was the same as Roy Spencer’s: 0.6 C/doubling or thereabouts.

    Wow.

  9. Adrian Vance says:

    At last the truth! The facts are very simple:

    CO2 is a “trace gas” in air and is insignificant by definition. It absorbs 1/7th as much IR, heat energy, from sunlight per molecule as water vapor which has 188 times as many molecules capturing 1200 times as much heat producing 99.8% of all “global warming.” CO2 does only 0.2% of it. For this we should destroy our economy, starve the world, cause hunger, riots and wars?

    There is no “greenhouse effect” in an atmosphere. A greenhouse has a solid, clear cover trapping heat. The atmosphere does not trap heat as gas molecules cannot form surfaces to work as greenhouses that admit and reflect energy depending on sun angle. Gases do not form surfaces as their molecules are not in contact.

    The Medieval Warming from 800 AD to 1300 AD Micheal Mann erased for his “hockey stick” was several Fahrenheit degrees warmer than anything “global warmers” fear. It was 500 years of world peace and abundance, longest ever.

    Vostock Ice Core data analysis show CO2 rises followed temperature by 800 years 19 times in 450,000 years. Therefore temperature change is cause and CO2 change is effect. This alone refutes the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis.

    Methane is called “a greenhouse gas 20 to 500 times more potent than CO2,” by Heidi Cullen and Jim Hansen, but it is not per the energy absorption chart at the American Meteorological Society. It has an absorption profile very similar to nitrogen which is classified “transparent” to IR, heat waves and is only present to 18 ppm. “Vegans” blame methane in cow flatulence for global warming in their war against meat consumption.

    Carbon combustion generates 80% of our energy. Control and taxing of carbon would give the elected ruling class more power and money than anything since the Magna Carta of 1215 AD.

    Most scientists and science educators work for tax supported institutions. They are eager to help government raise more money for them and they love being seen as “saving the planet.”

    Read the whole story in “Vapor Tiger” at Amazon.com, Kindle $2.99 including a free Kindle reading program for your computer.

    Google “Two Minute Conservative” for clarity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.