There isn’t one shred of evidence to support the idea that drought correlates with CO2.
Historical Palmer Drought Indices | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/cirs/climdiv/climdiv-pdsidv-v1.0.0-20231206
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
Recent Comments
- Bruce of Newcastle on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on Doubling Energy Costs
During the last 2000 years China had on average one famine per year;
most of them as result of droughts.
Every single one, even the least destructive and most insignificant of these 2000
pre global warming famines,
would be (ab)used today as ultimate proof for global warming.
It may also be of interest that the Wikipedia article ‘List of famines of China’
about the worst Chinese famines has no famine listed that happened during the Medieval Warm Period.(the Ministry of truth will rewrite this as soon as they realize the mistake)
They have one before and one after the MWP but none in the MWP timeframe ,
which indicates that warming periods are not that bad at all for humanity.
If we take a look at Population history of China at the useless propaganda outlet Wikipedia we will see that the Chinas population had now growth during the 1500 years before the MWP (40 mio on average) and went up by 350% during the next 3 centuries (similar thing happened in Europe iirc).
and a massive drop after the end of MWP.
(the Ministry of truth has to rewrite this article too)
Once again warming in general does not seem to have significant negative impacts.
Good information.
The problem is: how can the politicians, mainstream media and, thus, the poorly informed general public be alerted to the fact that they are being totally and utterly conned? I actually show graphs like the two above to people but they do not change their indoctrinated views in any way. Models produced by institutions (supposedly scientific) are preferred to empirical historic statistics. Until this is changed nothing will change and we will continue to flush money down the toilet in the pursuit of rectifying something that does not exist.
Tony, looking at the Palmer drought map for 1934 reminds me that my grandfather lost his farm here in Arkansas to bad crop years during that era. The banker who foreclosed on my grandfather was also a pall bearer when my grandfather died in 1938. I have laughed that not only did the banker foreclose on my grandfather but he also helped put him in the ground. I guess there were no hard feelings.