Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Bob G on “getting smaller”
- Patrick Powers on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- dm on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Charles Higley on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- stewartpid on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- arn on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Disillusioned on Time Traveling Satellites
- Disillusioned on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
1907 Monthly Weather Review Said That Bloggers Need To Call Out NOAA/NASA Data Tampering
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
I’m sure they believe that they are applying new and improved methods to data presentation. The fact that the last 50 years gets warmer and the preceding 100 get colder is merely the result of the improved methods. There is no expectation bias, much less data tampering. I’m also sure that 3, 12, 16, 22, 30 and 36 are the next lottery winners. [/sarc]
We know the warming is unprecedented, so the data must be wrong.
I think they were called ‘blockers’ back then.
They were lying about the climate of the Oklahoma Panhandle to attract more land jobbers, they didn’t want people back east to know the climate was very dry there.
How did that work out for the 1930’s dust bowlers, now in California?
That would make an interesting compendium: “The History of Climate Lies”.