Six Years Is The New Seventeen Years

7 Responses to Six Years Is The New Seventeen Years

1. @NJSnowFan says:

   November 2, 2013 at 1:22 pm

   Maybe your post should read

   “Lying.to accomplish your goals in life is the new American way to sucess”

   Simply amazing the BS that @agw_proff tweets.

   Reply
2. Cheshirered says:

   November 2, 2013 at 1:26 pm

   This devastating little factoid is killing alarmists. They hate it. Run with it for all it’s worth.

   (btw Steve I notice your comment didn’t last long on the Guardian’s polar bear thread. Ho ho, what a surprise.)

   Reply
3. Greg Locke says:

   November 2, 2013 at 1:57 pm

   A more telling fact is that the AGW crowd based their hysteria on about a 20 year warming trend. So they can argue for destroying the modern world on a 20 year trend, but a 17 year trend is childish to use as a rebuttal? I really am coming to dislike these guys.

   Reply
   • harrydhuffman (@harrydhuffman) says:

     November 2, 2013 at 4:57 pm

     …or only a 14 year warming trend, in the US, before fraudulent adjustments:

     Goddard: Roots of US data tampering go back 25 years

     Reply
4. Billy Liar says:

   November 2, 2013 at 5:59 pm

   OMG! Mandia has reproduced. Think of the CO2.

   Reply
5. Lars P. says:

   November 2, 2013 at 9:04 pm

   Well I think if his 6 years old would stop growing for some 4-5 years he has a real problem.
   This is in perspective the time when we got a warming (about 20 years) and not (17 years).

   In addition the 17 years have seen more CO2 anthropogenic emissions then the 20 years before….
   (2011 33 mil kt CO2 versus 22 mil kt CO2 in 1990)
   http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2ts1990-2011&sort=des9

   Reply
   • Olaf Koenders says:

     November 2, 2013 at 11:40 pm

     Exactly, but notice the CO2 drops radically every season. Something more powerful at work there – probably called winter at Mauna Loa..

     Reply