Twitter / AGW_Prof: 10-15 yrs of T data to claim …
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Robertvd on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Maybe your post should read
“Lying.to accomplish your goals in life is the new American way to sucess”
Simply amazing the BS that @agw_proff tweets.
This devastating little factoid is killing alarmists. They hate it. Run with it for all it’s worth.
(btw Steve I notice your comment didn’t last long on the Guardian’s polar bear thread. Ho ho, what a surprise.)
A more telling fact is that the AGW crowd based their hysteria on about a 20 year warming trend. So they can argue for destroying the modern world on a 20 year trend, but a 17 year trend is childish to use as a rebuttal? I really am coming to dislike these guys.
…or only a 14 year warming trend, in the US, before fraudulent adjustments:
Goddard: Roots of US data tampering go back 25 years
OMG! Mandia has reproduced. Think of the CO2.
Well I think if his 6 years old would stop growing for some 4-5 years he has a real problem.
This is in perspective the time when we got a warming (about 20 years) and not (17 years).
In addition the 17 years have seen more CO2 anthropogenic emissions then the 20 years before….
(2011 33 mil kt CO2 versus 22 mil kt CO2 in 1990)
http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2ts1990-2011&sort=des9
Exactly, but notice the CO2 drops radically every season. Something more powerful at work there – probably called winter at Mauna Loa..