It took him less than three hours to delete my comment. Settled science can’t stand up to any scrutiny. Real Climate also censored a similar comment from me.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- GW on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
I guess finger painting land and ice red, to indicate heat everywhere now qualifies as “scientific study”. Who knew that much the same accurate “science” was practiced daily by toddlers.
Real Climate always censors people who disagree. Isn’t that the site run by William Connealley, the same hockey player who used to have administration privileges at Wikipedia and used to ban everybody there? (Until he got banned himself)
I’d rather be in the bore hole anyway.
Keep at them Steve, you are one of the best. Nattercelli deserves all he gets for his part in the wanton destruction of America.
The odd thing is that they know such “studies” are garbage too. OK, maybe not Nutter, but those who run RC do.
Connolley
Frankly, I think the proper–and by the way, American–term would be “Nutty-celli”. “Nutter” is English slang, not American, and the man’s real name is Nutticelli, not Nutricelli. Get on the ball, people.