It took him less than three hours to delete my comment. Settled science can’t stand up to any scrutiny. Real Climate also censored a similar comment from me.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
I guess finger painting land and ice red, to indicate heat everywhere now qualifies as “scientific study”. Who knew that much the same accurate “science” was practiced daily by toddlers.
Real Climate always censors people who disagree. Isn’t that the site run by William Connealley, the same hockey player who used to have administration privileges at Wikipedia and used to ban everybody there? (Until he got banned himself)
I’d rather be in the bore hole anyway.
Keep at them Steve, you are one of the best. Nattercelli deserves all he gets for his part in the wanton destruction of America.
The odd thing is that they know such “studies” are garbage too. OK, maybe not Nutter, but those who run RC do.
Connolley
Frankly, I think the proper–and by the way, American–term would be “Nutty-celli”. “Nutter” is English slang, not American, and the man’s real name is Nutticelli, not Nutricelli. Get on the ball, people.