Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Recent Comments
- spike55 on Someone Just Volunteered To Debate!
- spike55 on Someone Just Volunteered To Debate!
- KevinPaul on Someone Just Volunteered To Debate!
- Robertv on Someone Just Volunteered To Debate!
- William Jackson on Dismantling The Time Of Observation Bias
Categories
Meta
It held up remarkably well, considering the large El Nino earlier in the year and the later strong storms.
Pretty sure there will not be an El Nino next year.
Except there is not much of a relationship between El Niño and Arctic sea ice. So reagrding Arctic sea ice, you can’t blame anything this year, nor predict anything next year based on ENSO.
So are saying that the El Nino didn’t push a whole heap of warmer air over the Arctic this year?
You should maybe go and look at some temperature charts
Wonders will never cease. We agree on something Andy!
http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2016/04/claim-arctic-sea-ice-holds-firm/
Yep Jimbo, there was an El Nino.
Well done. You finally woke up to the fact.
Your chart shows that El Ninos do have an influence on NCEP Reanalysis temps for up there.
So, purely NATURAL, and nothing to do with anthropogenic.
We agree again. Isn’t it wonderful :-)
So we’re agreed on the obvious trend then!
Jim, got that graph back to 1935 please.
Yep, most of the time we have near ZERO TREND.. as I showed above.
NATURAL solar/wind driven El Ninos have given step like increases in 1998 and 1979. we will see where the current El Nino settles down.
Given that El Ninos have absolutely nothing to do with CO2, there is absolutely no sign of any anthropogenic warming in the Arctic.
Glad you agree.
Now can you drop your moronic Arctic sea ice scare stupidity. !!
And I just love the claim that NCEP can “reanalyse ” back to 1958.
So funny.
And WHY are you putting forward a “reanalysis” rather than real data ???
Did you manage to find anything that wasn’t pointless yearly average junk.?
Oh Boy, that was a close one. Jim Hansen had me worried that the red line might go right to the bottom of the page! Now that that worry is over I can get back to worrying about those big hurricanes that are going to come more often, like Jim and Al said, and destroy all those beach houses. Think about that one – how could mankind survive the loss of all that beach front property? What would we do?!?
As Cut-my-own-throat-Dibbler would say, the faster-than-ever-rising sea level provides opportunities to sell new beach front property.
This is what Dibbler would do. It would probably also be what Al Gore would do. He’s after the money.
I don’t quite like to call AGW a scam, but DCC (dangerous climate change) sounds like one. Lots of dire claims with little meat on them. Makes me tired. Several meters of modelled future Antarctic sea level rise in your.
wert said at 5:59 am
I don’t quite like to call AGW a scam,
Group Think is too mild, Hoax is too whimsical and Scam may be a little harsh, but it’s the closest. Lots of people want the gravy train to keep on rolling along.
Snake oil salesmen.
Don’t you find this interesting though Tony?
http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2016/09/september-arctic-cyclone-alert/#Sep-17
The Tempest?
It is still as Tony says: “Much ado about nothing”. Just like your blog.
A picture of Jim’s “tempest” at Barrow Alaska http://feeder.gina.alaska.edu/webcam-uaf-barrow-seaice-images/current/image
It appears to be wintery and still.
Did you check the Barrow surf forecast though Stewart?
FYI, September 18th is tomorrow.
P.S. The Barrow surf cam is currently stuck on the 16th, when it was indeed “wintery and still”!
Did it reach Zero yet,Jim?
Ask Wadhams.. He knows what zero is. !
A prime example of zero accuracy and zero competence.
Are you blind Tommy ? Can’t you see the graph just above?
Yep, there’s still one heck of a lot of sea ice up there,
… isn’t there, Jimbo.
Second smallest minimum area since 1979 Andy.
So what !
Meaningless over such a piddlingly small time.
How about we consider the longer time..
Lots of info shows that for large periods before the neoglaciation down to the LIA, sea ice was “seasonal”
ie often zero in summer
The levels at the moment are still very high in comparison to all but the coldest period in the last 10,000 year
You KNOW that, but will REFUSE TO ADMIT THE TRUTH, as always.
Andy, the dude is bizzare, but if the CAGW proponents think Guam will tip over, then the likely assume their opponents think it will not because of Kerry’s weird assumptions. (Hey J.K., major ridicule backfire, back to ” rules for radicals 101 for you)
Yes, it is “much ado about nothing”.