Some exciting news. I am about to release a brand new python based version of my GHCN software, which replaces the C++ code. The code size is very small, and is easy to understand and verify. It will be devastating for climate fraudsters at NASA, NOAA and Berkeley Earth. Here are my first graphs from it. I’m still verifying the software, so there may still be errors in the code.
Extemely interesting, cant wait :-) Thanks!!
K.R. Frank Lansner
Time to publicly debunk UN climate science now !
Sample comparison for avg high max between July 1930-36 and 2011-17. Not even close!
Nice … good work Brian.
Great job Brian!
Brian, can you get the scale bar to stay the same.?
No, map generator does that, and I can’t change it. Sorry. It is the same scale just labeled different when a new color is added on either end.
I know its the same scale. :-)
This is made from two images, isn’t it. Couldn’t you cut/paste the scale of one and put it onto the other before you animate it?
I’m currently using your ‘Pulling Back the Curtain’ v1.10. The climate freaks hate it :)
Just one question, what is the ‘base-period’ for Aussie GHCN stations?
It’s good to see climate freaks behave rationally, for the sake of novelty.
These are beautiful graphs, simply presented and well labeled and gets the point across to a wide audience
Cool. Can’t wait to download and try it out. If you want to crowdsource debug or code checking assignments, we may be able to look for errors.
Tony,
Do you never rest? You are awesome, a one-man wrecking crew destroying the warmunist data-fakers.
Thanks for all you do.
Griff owes you some money. We all do; so hit the tip jar!
It is totally unfair to plot graphs of raw data.
You did not give those crooks time to insert adjustments designed to create a warming trend.
No worries, GC. They’ll fix it in the code when they get their mitts on it.
It is totally unfair to plot graphs of raw data.
The climate freaks hate it.
I posted a TEMPARATURE (not anomalies) graph on FB recently and a climate warrior asked me “what is the base-period for the above graph?”
They have NFI what an absolute TEMP graph is!
They have NFI. Period.
If they did they wouldn’t be liberals.
Leftists.
Tony,
Here is data for Sydney and Melbourne in that nice place Australia that you visited.
It might be useful to check against your analytical software.
The data give a comprehensive view of heatwaves and hot days for these 2 cities that together house about half the population here.
The glaring conclusion is that there is no evidence of significant warming from this study. The official line states that there is.
Please email me at sherro1 at optusnet com au if you need more.
It is well worth a look. Geoff.
http://www.geoffstuff.com/isithotorisitnot.xlsx
nice work, Geoff …
(tiny remark, in graph 4 title, “1859” instead of 1959 …)
thanks for the excel !
A VERY interesting article at JoNova.
And you thought US temperature data was iffy !!
http://joannenova.com.au/2017/08/another-bom-scandal-australian-climate-data-is-being-destroyed-as-routine-practice/
Wow.
Inconvenient data …
Wait.. So your telling me the Earth has actually been getting colder over the past century? We really do live in opposite land.
Unless you are 100 years old and a very good memory or have studied history like I have, you have no way of knowing what temperatures were like 100 years ago. You are relying on graphs generated by a dozen people at government agencies – which is not science.
Matt:
First off, these are US stations.
The data is correct. Almost all of the “warming” is warmer WINTER temperatures and warmer SUMMER NIGHT TIME LOWS.
Daytime summer high temperatures don’t begin to approach the 1930s “Dust Bowl” era.
But if you take an average of each day of the year (and toss in a few adjustments), you can make claims like HOTTEST YEAR EVAH!!!
Matt, can you show us data from your “land”?
President Trump being investigated for collision while Clintonestas walk free uninvestigated. The trace gas CO2 is an “imminent” threat to all life on earth. Yes.. we can keep the sea levels from “ever” rising.. (or falling) “ever” again, based solely on regulating levels of the trace gas co2, or are you a sea-level change denier? Plate tectonics denier? Miami will be under 40 feet of water by 2100. All the opposite land of actual reality., Need I say more?
tonyheller, David Jay,
Thank you for the clarification. Is no wonder why the public is so easily manipulated by these “graphs” when the details and nuances are not completely taken into context.
Thanks Tony (and the others) for putting what I have known for a long time in a coherent, very understandable format. Every American needs to know that they have scammed blind by fake scientists, fake politicians and the fake media. This could be a big game changer if this information is widely disseminated.