GHCN Software Version 2.0

Some exciting news. I am about to release a brand new python based version of my GHCN software, which replaces the C++ code. The code size is very small, and is easy to understand and verify. It will be devastating for climate fraudsters at NASA, NOAA and Berkeley Earth. Here are my first graphs from it. I’m still verifying the software, so there may still be errors in the code.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to GHCN Software Version 2.0

  1. Frank Lansner says:

    Extemely interesting, cant wait :-) Thanks!!

    K.R. Frank Lansner

  2. Jan Goffa says:

    Time to publicly debunk UN climate science now !

  3. Brian D says:

    Sample comparison for avg high max between July 1930-36 and 2011-17. Not even close!

  4. BruceC says:

    I’m currently using your ‘Pulling Back the Curtain’ v1.10. The climate freaks hate it :)

    Just one question, what is the ‘base-period’ for Aussie GHCN stations?

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      The climate freaks hate it :)

      It’s good to see climate freaks behave rationally, for the sake of novelty.

  5. Kris J says:

    These are beautiful graphs, simply presented and well labeled and gets the point across to a wide audience

  6. Cool. Can’t wait to download and try it out. If you want to crowdsource debug or code checking assignments, we may be able to look for errors.

  7. gregole says:

    Tony,
    Do you never rest? You are awesome, a one-man wrecking crew destroying the warmunist data-fakers.

    Thanks for all you do.

    Griff owes you some money. We all do; so hit the tip jar!

  8. It is totally unfair to plot graphs of raw data.

    You did not give those crooks time to insert adjustments designed to create a warming trend.

  9. Geoff Sherrington says:

    Tony,
    Here is data for Sydney and Melbourne in that nice place Australia that you visited.
    It might be useful to check against your analytical software.

    The data give a comprehensive view of heatwaves and hot days for these 2 cities that together house about half the population here.

    The glaring conclusion is that there is no evidence of significant warming from this study. The official line states that there is.

    Please email me at sherro1 at optusnet com au if you need more.
    It is well worth a look. Geoff.
    http://www.geoffstuff.com/isithotorisitnot.xlsx

    • ducdorleans says:

      nice work, Geoff …

      (tiny remark, in graph 4 title, “1859” instead of 1959 …)

      thanks for the excel !

  10. AndyG55 says:

    A VERY interesting article at JoNova.

    And you thought US temperature data was iffy !!

    http://joannenova.com.au/2017/08/another-bom-scandal-australian-climate-data-is-being-destroyed-as-routine-practice/

  11. Matt says:

    Wait.. So your telling me the Earth has actually been getting colder over the past century? We really do live in opposite land.

    • tonyheller says:

      Unless you are 100 years old and a very good memory or have studied history like I have, you have no way of knowing what temperatures were like 100 years ago. You are relying on graphs generated by a dozen people at government agencies – which is not science.

    • David Jay says:

      Matt:

      First off, these are US stations.

      The data is correct. Almost all of the “warming” is warmer WINTER temperatures and warmer SUMMER NIGHT TIME LOWS.

      Daytime summer high temperatures don’t begin to approach the 1930s “Dust Bowl” era.

      But if you take an average of each day of the year (and toss in a few adjustments), you can make claims like HOTTEST YEAR EVAH!!!

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      Matt, can you show us data from your “land”?

      • Matt says:

        President Trump being investigated for collision while Clintonestas walk free uninvestigated. The trace gas CO2 is an “imminent” threat to all life on earth. Yes.. we can keep the sea levels from “ever” rising.. (or falling) “ever” again, based solely on regulating levels of the trace gas co2, or are you a sea-level change denier? Plate tectonics denier? Miami will be under 40 feet of water by 2100. All the opposite land of actual reality., Need I say more?

    • Matt says:

      tonyheller, David Jay,

      Thank you for the clarification. Is no wonder why the public is so easily manipulated by these “graphs” when the details and nuances are not completely taken into context.

  12. Andy DC says:

    Thanks Tony (and the others) for putting what I have known for a long time in a coherent, very understandable format. Every American needs to know that they have scammed blind by fake scientists, fake politicians and the fake media. This could be a big game changer if this information is widely disseminated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *