The Rise Of The Brownshirts

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.

– Voltaire

I experienced similar insanity from the left at President Trump’s inauguration. These people are unable to think rationally, and have no sense of common decency or self-control.  They are being trained by their leaders to destroy civilization.

Hillary Clinton, in a television interview Tuesday, rejected the idea that Democrats should be “civil” with Republicans in the age of Donald Trump, embracing a more confrontational and aggressive political approach. “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,” Clinton said.

Hillary Clinton: Democrats ‘cannot be civil’ with Republicans

This web site blamed Hillary Clinton’s disgusting remarks on President Trump.

Hillary Clinton Says Democrats Can’t Be Civil Until They’re Back in Power

Donald Trump seems to think civility is for losers.

Hillary Clinton Says Democrats Can’t Be Civil Until They’re Back in Power – Hit & Run : Reason.com

The correct interpretation would be Hillary Clinton seems to think civility is for winners.  But our Orwellian press reversed logic – like they always do.

Everyone who doesn’t believe what you believe, must be destroyed. That is the philosophy of ISIS and Democrats.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

31 Responses to The Rise Of The Brownshirts

  1. arn says:

    You can not be civil with a political party that wants to destroy your country and everything it stands for”

    • pinroot says:

      “…a political party that wants to destroy your country and everything it stands for.” Sounds a lot like the Democrats, doesn’t it?

      • arn says:

        This was not my intention :).
        Just a coincidence.

        (btw,by some bigger coincidence this also sounds like Merkel,Macron,Treaudeu- everything exactly right in time for globalisation just as TPP ,TTP and world wide co2 tax)

    • Andy says:

      “You can not be civil with a political party that wants to destroy your country and everything it stands for”

      Are you going to start shooting with your AR-15 arn(ie) ?

      Just askin….

  2. GW Smith says:

    When civility ends war begins. Destruction and death are the traditional ways of the world of islam. She belongs there.

  3. Mr GrimNasty says:

    Ah………. ‘gravity is only a theory’, she forgot ‘you believe the moon landings were fake’.

    It’s like they all go to the same brainwasher.

    If I had a penny…….

  4. Mick J says:

    Harangued a fellow passenger for not being of her faith and then played the sympathy card when challenged, no surprise there. The clapping of her forced departure is heart warming.

  5. frederik wisse says:

    A prototype brownshirt Mr Muller is executing Voltaires wisdom . Who is giving him the opportunity to continue his uncivilised crusade ? Pantssuits ?

  6. Jimmy Haigh says:

    What a great video! It made my day.

  7. David of Aussie says:

    French police at work during the yellow shirt protests

    https://twitter.com/EyesOnBorders/status/1070112788201304070

  8. Andy says:

    Hold on a second

    you just said

    “They are being trained by their leaders to destroy civilization”

    and the title of the video was

    “Liberal Hag thrown off airplane”

    When actually what happened was the flight crew handled a rather grumpy old person well and everyone was relieved when they got removed!

    It can be a racist old grumpy fucker of a bloke as well —

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6299671/Shocking-moment-Ryanair-passenger-unleashes-torrent-racist-abuse-woman-sitting-him.html

    The only take away is that flight crew have a tough job. At least those weren’t

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/david-dao-doctor-dragged-plane-files-court-papers-demanding-united-n745721

    or even worse, a small dog

    https://news.sky.com/story/anger-after-dog-dies-in-planes-overhead-locker-11289101

    Was the old bloke, the dentist or the dog about to destroy civilisation?

    Nah ;)

    Andy

    • spike55 says:

      No, but the AGW agenda is targeted at doing so, as stated by several high-up AGW priests.

      And YOU are supporting it. That is just SICK !

      You should be ashamed of yourself,

      but AGW apologists don’t feel shame., they just “believe”

  9. Andy says:

    Any chance of some science around here?

    Arctic sea ice extent growth has dived recently.

    It just got thrown off the plane.

    HAHAHAHAHAHA

    Andy

    • griff says:

      Sadly, this blog isn’t about science any more… it is a peculiar brand of right wing Republican propaganda. The ‘science’ bits seem mostly to be there from habit …

      still, the photos just get better!

      • Gator says:

        Me Griff, you wouldn’t science if it put you in a pit and pissed on you.

        All you care about is snuffing out poor brown people. You use a false religion to do so. Want science?

        These were the bad projects. As you might see the bottom of the list was climate change. This offends a lot of people, and that’s probably one of the things where people will say I shouldn’t come back, either. And I’d like to talk about that, because that’s really curious. Why is it it came up? And I’ll actually also try to get back to this because it’s probably one of the things that we’ll disagree with on the list that you wrote down.

        The reason why they came up with saying that Kyoto — or doing something more than Kyoto — is a bad deal is simply because it’s very inefficient. It’s not saying that global warming is not happening. It’s not saying that it’s not a big problem. But it’s saying that what we can do about it is very little, at a very high cost. What they basically show us, the average of all macroeconomic models, is that Kyoto, if everyone agreed, would cost about 150 billion dollars a year. That’s a substantial amount of money. That’s two to three times the global development aid that we give the Third World every year. Yet it would do very little good. All models show it will postpone warming for about six years in 2100. So the guy in Bangladesh who gets a flood in 2100 can wait until 2106. Which is a little good, but not very much good. So the idea here really is to say, well, we’ve spent a lot of money doing a little good.

        And just to give you a sense of reference, the U.N. actually estimate that for half that amount, for about 75 billion dollars a year, we could solve all major basic problems in the world. We could give clean drinking water, sanitation, basic healthcare and education to every single human being on the planet. So we have to ask ourselves, do we want to spend twice the amount on doing very little good? Or half the amount on doing an amazing amount of good? And that is really why it becomes a bad project. It’s not to say that if we had all the money in the world, we wouldn’t want to do it. But it’s to say, when we don’t, it’s just simply not our first priority.

        http://www.ted.com/talks/bjorn_lomborg_sets_global_priorities/transcript?language=en

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dtbn9zBfJSs

        Why do you hate poor brown people Ms Griff?

      • spike55 says:

        come on griffool or little-andy, lets see your science.

        Produce empirical scientific evidence that atmospheric CO2 causes warming

        We can wait while you run around like headless chooks !!!

      • MGJ says:

        People can speak for themselves but I suspect most contributors view the majority of the GOP establishment as thoroughly corrupt and cowardly. Just not as lunatic or dangerous as the alternative.

        President Trump’s attraction stems from being hated by both parties.

    • spike55 says:

      The idiot little-andy pokes his head out of his sewer again.

      NSIDC is above the 11 year average

      DMI volume just above average for 13 years

      Still in the top 10% of the last 10,000 years.

      Neither little-andy or griffool have the slightest idea about real science.

      Take another faceplant little-andy , you deserve it.

  10. Gamecock says:

    ‘Hillary Clinton, in a television interview Tuesday, rejected the idea that Democrats should be “civil” with Republicans in the age of Donald Trump, embracing a more confrontational and aggressive political approach. “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,” Clinton said.’

    Fascists who demonize their opposition are Nazis. Sig heil, Hillary!

    Hillary Clinton is a James Bond villain. That tens of millions of Americans voted for her is a national embarrassment.

  11. Paul Homewood says:

    I feel sorry for the hag’s husband!

    • Disillusioned says:

      While I appreciate your empathy, Paul. I don’t feel sorry for hubby.

      He is in her corner. They threw her off the plane, and he went with her. There’s a 97%™ probability he believes the same fascist propaganda that she believes. They’re two peas in a pod, and could have left that pod a long time ago. Methinks he deserves the nasty hag with whom he has chosen to spend his life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.