Obama Didn’t Know It Was A Terror Attack Before He Did Know It Was A Terror Attack Before He Didn’t Know It Was A Terror Attack Before He Did Know It Was A Terror Attack

9 Responses to Obama Didn’t Know It Was A Terror Attack Before He Did Know It Was A Terror Attack Before He Didn’t Know It Was A Terror Attack Before He Did Know It Was A Terror Attack

1. Edmonton Al says:

   February 4, 2014 at 1:07 pm

   Right you are… But-
   Occasionally a used car salesman tells the truth.
   BO …. never.

   Reply
   • harrydhuffman (@harrydhuffman) says:

     February 4, 2014 at 2:37 pm

     Which explains why he is not fit to be one.

     Reply
2. gator69 says:

   February 4, 2014 at 2:23 pm

   The answer to Bill’s question was a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’. Anything else was a lie.

   Reply
3. NotAGolfer says:

   February 4, 2014 at 2:34 pm

   Obama tries his best to conflate the terms “act of terror” and “crime.” He calls everyday murder and rape “acts of terror” and “crime,” and he calls Benghazi an “act of terror” and “crime.” However, he won’t call anyone a “terrorist” or any event “terrorism”. He doesn’t believe in terrorism. He thinks what most call terrorist acts do not require any extraordinary attention or legal consideration than everyday crime. His use of “act of terror” about Benghazi allowed him to later, during the debate, to wiggle around the accusation that he wouldn’t call the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack. “I called it an ‘act of terror’ he proudly proclaims.

   I wish someone would have briefed Romney, before the debate moderated by Candy, about Obama’s word play, so that he could have pressed on why he wouldn’t call the attackers or anyone terrorists–or why he wouldn’t call any event terrorism.

   Reply
   • Dave G says:

     February 4, 2014 at 9:35 pm

     Actually Obama didn’t wiggle in the debate. Candy Cowley did.

     Reply
4. GoneWithTheWind says:

   February 4, 2014 at 6:00 pm

   I sincerely hope this is nothing more then Obama covering up his huge failure in Benghaz so it didn’t interfere with his reelection. The coverup is still a crime but at least that is all of it. My fear is there is something more that is being covered up.

   Reply
5. David, UK says:

   February 5, 2014 at 8:56 pm

   Or alternatively he’s the ideal used car salesman. Just depends if you’re on the side of the seller or the poor schmuck who’s buying.

   Reply
   • David, UK says:

     February 5, 2014 at 9:00 pm

     D’oh, sorry I missed the point – I withdraw my comment! The guy would clearly make a shit used car salesman, whichever way you look at it!

     Reply
6. Steve Clough says:

   February 5, 2014 at 9:40 pm

   What O’Reilly and the rest of the press should be asking BHO, HC and Susan Rice et al, is where did you get the intelligence that said Benghazi attack was the result of a video. Who was this person that first said this to these people? What intelligence? That is the first question that needs to be asked. That sets up everything after that and should uncover all the other lies!

   Reply