[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP4FjODPDFA]
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
Recent Comments
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Bob G on “getting smaller”
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Hank Phillips on “getting smaller”
- Francis Barnett on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Bob G on “getting smaller”
Where is the proof of your claim that guns “deter tens of millions of potential crimes every year?”
Are you really as stupid as you pretend to be?
I’m afraid he is. He doesn’t understand why law enforcement and security guards carry millions of firearms around in the US, as there is no evidence they have deterrent effect (in his mind).
Even more so, I suspect.
When his parents get home and find out that he has been using their computer, they are going to be very, very, upset with him.
Yet again: Where is the proof of your claim that guns “deter tens of millions of potential crimes every year?”
Why does law enforcement and security guards carry guns Appell if you fervently believe they have no deterrent effect?
I just want to know: Where is the proof of the claim that guns “deter tens of millions of potential crimes every year?”
David, I don’t know what drugs you are taking, but you have made the same post about 15 times, and have gone extremely far into the world of spam.
Because there are already far too many guns in society.
Where is the proof of your claim that guns “deter tens of millions of potential crimes every year?”
[David has been sent to SPAM]
Will you answer the question I asked you, yes or no?
Ignoring a rebuttal by repeating your question doesn’t mean you’re winning the argument. It means you’re a moron. Are you going to argue why the rebuttal is wrong or are you are just going to continue to pretend there is no rebuttal?
I wanted Appell to answer the question as to why security guards who transport money, etc., carry guns, if they have no deterrent effect?
Security guards have to carry guns because there are so many guns in circulation.
Which just proves the degree of the problem.
[Snip SPAM]
The Journal News just hired armed guards. David Gregory’s kids attend a school with multiple armed guards. Every money transfer in Mexico involves at least three armed guards.
“Security guards have to carry guns because there are so many guns in circulation.”
Your claim – which you have spammed here multiple times – was that guns were not a deterrent. Your reply now contradicts your claim because you are now asserting they are a deterrent.
The proof is that in 6 thousand years of human history we are the only standing world power that its people have remained a relatively free society from tyrannical jackasses like you.
Your basic premise is that if you somehow could magically make weapons disappear then there would be less violence. This completely ignores six thousand years of known history. Man has been proven without a shadow of doubt to have the capacity to perform great feats of evil. Only sociopaths will debate this fact.
So which is it David? Either you are completely ignorant of human history or you have the desire for your neighbor to be completely defenseless to either the designs of government or yourself. You either want justice to prevail and the designs of evil wicked men to be thwarted or you want people to be defenseless and evil to rule.
If you think that there are too many guns in circulation then I have a good idea where you stand. It sounds like your desire is for evil wicked men to prosper and for good men to be defenseless against them.
Which makes you evil.
Nicely said.
This is where the cowardly Steve Guttart blocks comments — after writing to me asking for replies.
What a sad old man.
Toshinmack, It Sucks Donut! Eatmore and WhineMore. Waah Waah! And have some Cheese with this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVFBK9GhS5Q
Typical unhinged PHD holder who was answered several times but he wants the exact number before he is satisfied which is impossible because he is too over educated to realize that what I have known for over 15 years is that several million gun based crime control actions by citizens are done EACH YEAR to stop a would be rapist,assault,theft and more.
The excited PHD boy fails to realize that ALL of the mass murders are done in gun free zones and that the shooter is always shown to have drug or mental problems.It is
NEVER the sane citizen doing it and even a NRA member is not the cause of a single case.
When are you going to chose reality over emotionalism when you think about “gun control”?
In case you need more proof that this does happen (other than the above rant, that is) – here it is:
Britain’s worst midwife: She drops a baby on its head
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2129023/Britains-worst-midwife-She-drops-baby-head-nearly-electrocutes-mother-birthing-pool-plugging-monitor-mains.html
Toshinmack, is bobbing fer Appells again and comming up empty! 😆
That’s gun control I can get behind.
I wonder if Toshinmack is worried about the smoke that the dragons breath caused. 😆
Here is what your military has.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAiJLdQQZz4
I want one……
David Appell says:
January 5, 2013 at 5:29 am
[Security guards need guns b]ecause there are already far too many guns in society.
Indeed. So the answer is obviously to ban guns, following which the criminals will be utterly compelled to hand over all their weapons. Then the streets, banks and school-kiddies will be safe, and there will be no more need for armed security guards. Armed security guards will become a rare and exciting event. Children just aren’t going to know what armed security guards are.
I don’t see a flaw in the argument. [/sarc]
“No Criminal Is Stupid Enough To Risk This Fate”
http://americasdumbestcriminals.com/
There’ll always be one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2gmzPLtBmk
Looks staged to me.
Guess what they are doing to protect the children from Sandy Hook that are now going to a new school? They have armed guards protecting them, just like that “insane” LaPierre recommended. Hmmmm. Who’s insane now?
The Second Amendment is in place to protect the citizen from the Government. All other discourse about gun control is irrelevant.