Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- D. Boss on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- D. Boss on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- BenV on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Jack the Insider on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- conrad ziefle on New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
Daily Archives: January 14, 2014
Dana Trying To Top Peter Gleick In The Climate Fraudster Department
Not only did Dana use the wrong scenario (B when it should have been A) but he plotted scenario B too low (red line) GISS is now 0.4C below scenario B, and Dana shows it 0.2 C below.
Posted in Uncategorized
14 Comments
