Government climate fraudsters claim that they know Southern Hemisphere temperatures back to 1880, and that they basically match northern hemisphere temperatures.
What Gavin forgot to mention is that the southern hemisphere graph is fake. In 1978, scientists agreed data south of 30S was too meager to be reliable.
The 1990 IPCC report showed that there was insufficient temperature data for analysis in much of the Arctic, most of the southern oceans, and all of the Antarctic.
In Climategate E-Mails, Phil Jones admitted that much of his southern hemisphere ocean temperatures were made up, because there is no actual data.
(h/t Gail Combs)
In 1997, NASA showed that three fourths of southern hemisphere land warming occurred before 1940.
web.archive.org/web/19970714134657/http://www.giss.nasa.gov/Data/GISTEMP/ZonAnn.Ts.txt
Now let’s look at what the criminals at NASA have done since 1997. They now show almost no southern hemisphere warming before 1940, and 80% of warming occurring after 1940.
They accomplished this fraud largely by throwing in lots of non-existent ocean temperature data.
“Climate Science” is becoming a fact-free zone, and this is quite possibly as dangerous as a gun-free zone.
Pointing out the fraud will only play to those in our church. There is a way to do it [think Mike Sanicola] and it’s almost childishly easy. I’m about 3 (+/-) hrs. S. of you and “Have CO2-meter, Can Travel.”
SG says: “What Gavin forgot to mention is that the southern hemisphere graph is fake.”
Why would anyone think that he would so anything less since much of his northern hemisphere thermometer “data” is fake also?
But do you have any peer reviewed studies PROVING that the non-existent data doesn’t exist?
Don’t you mean does Galvin have any pal review studies with the data in it. Galvin is making the claims that the world is warming the gathering and providing the data is on him. At least that the way science use to work!
Sorry, inside joke. That’s a reference to the interminable demands of one of our resident imbeciles on this site.
I just answered one of his loopy logic points:
CFool says: “No proof of a fraud has been presented. Smoke and mirrors it seems.”
Yeah, right try that on the IRS! Civil Asset Confiscation: The US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Can Now Seize Bank Accounts On Suspicion Alone
GOTTA pay all those
bribessalaries to the ClimAstrologists some how I guess.The supposed “justification” for the seizures is that the money itself is charged with a crime. No, I am not joking. There will be a case filed with a name like “United States vs $21,548 dollars in cash” or perhaps, “State of Maryland vs House at 2757 Elm Street, Springfield, Maryland”. Because an inanimate object has been charged with a crime, it has no Constitutional rights. There is no “innocent until proven guilty.” No, I am not making this up. That is how it works. It truly is theft under color of law.
Can anyone doubt that the equal rule of law no longer applies in the United States? The fat lady has finished her aria and left the stage. The only people who don’t know it are the ones in the audience who are still asleep.
Gail, see also Constructive Fraud
Under contract law, a defendant can be liable to a plaintiff for constructive fraud if there was: (1) a false misrepresentation; (2) in reference to a material fact; (3) for the purpose of inducing the other party to rely on such representation; 4) on which the other party did justifiably rely; (5) which resulted in damages or injury; and (6) a fiduciary relationship between the parties. Hagarty v. Ithaca City School District, 423 N.Y.S. 2d 843 (1979).
Bad intent or dishonesty is not a requirement to satisfy constructive fraud.
The elements for actual and constructive fraud are the same with two exceptions: constructive fraud drops the element of scienter–knowledge on the part of the injurer of the representation’s falsity–and adds the element of a fiduciary relationship.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/constructive_fraud
It is a false misrepresentation, a material fact (no warming without it), its purpose it to get people to rely on it, some are justifiably relying, our power bills and study grants are injuring us, they are paid (fiduciary) by taxpayers. We do not need to show intent under Constructive Fraud.
Thanks Jason and DD More
COLOR OF THE LAW (what is happening in the USA)
USC Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 13 § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law
Summary:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Now think of the EPA and their illegal human guinea pig trials at universities.
Teen dies:
http://junkscience.com/2012/10/12/teenager-died-in-1996-government-funded-air-pollution-experiment-at-univ-rochester-university-now-using-diabetics-as-air-pollution-guinea-pigs/
http://junkscience.com/2013/01/01/epas-illegal-human-experiments-could-break-nuremberg-code/
And our blasted courts side with the murders…
http://junkscience.com/2013/02/01/human-testing-lawsuit-dismissed-court-lacks-jurisdiction-to-hear-case-against-epa/
The corruption is throughout the system at this point. All the way up to the Supreme Court that ruled our rights to a jury trial no longer exist!
Sometimes a scam, fraud, delusion, whatever is so large and widespread that it is hard for the common man to believe it is going on. “How could that many people be in on it and it still be secret?”
The surface temperature records are a massive fraud of unbelievable proportions. This site documents this fact nearly daily, but the average man “on the street” in the US would never believe what is revealed here. There are no “scientists” working at NOAA or NASS, only propagandists paid to defraud the public.
The surface temperature record just makes up data for large parts of the earth’s surface (how many thermometers in South America for example) and when they have temperature reading they change these reading by “adjustment” and then call the “adjustments” as data. Unbelievable!
There must be some sort (say 1,500 words or less) way to show the massive nature of the fraud. Must be.
markstoval says:
December 21, 2015 at 11:03 am
…
The surface temperature record just makes up data for large parts of the earth’s surface (how many thermometers in South America for example) and when they have temperature reading they change these reading by “adjustment” and then call the “adjustments” as data….
They change data from 100 or more years ago every month.
You might be interested in this
http://www.c3headlines.com/2015/12/unprecedented-modern-global-warming-study-discovers-its-not-happening-in-chile.html
Like the old average temperatures of Australia, Chile showed cooling in the first half of the 20th C and then warming in the second half.
Amazingly, the SH follows the NH closely in the first half of the 20th C in GISS and HadCRUT (up until the satellite ere).