Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
- The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist Speaks Out
- Startling New Revelation
- Just An Illusion
- Climate Conditioning
- Fact Checking Reuters
- No Correlation
- I Offended Their Religion
- The High Priest Has Forbidden Questioning His Religion
- Hiding And Rewriting History
- Fact-Free Economist
- Academic Tipping Points
- Desperate Academics
- Climate Misinformation
- Unreliable And Toxic
- Unreliable And Toxic
- Fossil Fuels To End Risotto
- HG Wells “CHANGES IN THE WORLD’S CLIMATE” 1920
- SCIENCE : THE ICE AGE COMETH?
- Climate Misinformation
- “Goodbye New York. Goodbye Washington”
- Climate Refugees
Recent Comments
- Jimmy Haigh on Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- jb on Michael Mann Again
- Bill Odom on Michael Mann Again
- Richard E Fritz on Michael Mann Again
- Francis Barnett on Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Again
- arn on Michael Mann Again
- Conrad Ziefle on Michael Mann Again
- arn on Michael Mann Again
- Richard E Fritz on Michael Mann’s Latest Research
hot damn!!!!!
Good for you and him! (and us)
That was also my first thought, Darryl.
Well done.
The trouble with truth…… it always gets out in the end.
Well, of course….your graph says it all loudly and clearly. Thank G-d Cruz knows it too!
Ted Cruz was excellent today.
it all boils done to these simple facts as Ted Cruz put it:
1.CO2 is good for plant life
2. The Earth is greening
3. For significant periods of earth’s history there have been significantly more CO2 in atmosphere which did not come from burning fossil fuels.
4. For 18 years both balloon and satellite data show no warming
5. That satellite and balloon are the best evidence of whether the earth is currently warming
6. That seas were increasing more in 1st half of 20th century
7.That the computer models – that say we have to raise cost of living of all and make it harder to make ends meet – are profoundly wrong and inconsistent with the data and evidence.
(there should be eight – I’ve either missed one or doubled up)
Awesome Tony!
Can someone link to some of the hearing. I missed the whole thing.
Heartland will post a YouTube link sometime soon.
.. Also, there are .PDF’s of the witness’ testimony here: .. http://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2015/12/data-or-dogma-promoting-open-inquiry-in-the-debate-over-the-magnitude-of-human-impact-on-earth-s-climate
I have uploaded some extracts from the hearing here:
John Christy testimony: .. https://youtu.be/-AZu6Ijp5w4
Judith Curry testimony: .. https://youtu.be/q-jttIlY2mQ
Ted Cruz chart presentations, with comments by Judith Curry, William Happer, and Mark Steyn: .. https://youtu.be/xJLNFBb_X08
Isn’t this where Martin tells us it’s the wrong graph?
You made me laugh out loud on that one.
+1 Me too!!
😀
😀 And cfgjd will complain the US temperature is even mentioned. It covers only 4% of the Earth surface!
But did the people who he was talking to understand it?
I don’t think the chip those clones are all programmed with allowed them to deviate from their script.
This is such great news, I’m sure you are proud.
Good to see your graph being put to a good political use, Steve.
One more thing to like about Ted cruz. Now if we could just get Rand Paul as VP…
Well done sir!!
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery
That’s great! We all keep talking about the truth finally getting out there – well there it is!
What better accolade can you get Tony than that a potential future US president thinks your graph worthy & credible enough to make his case.
Now go sue the socks of him for copyright theft (joke)
Go Tony!!!!
While the climate criminals are all sipping champagne in Paris, the real politicking, with the likely new VPOTUS if not POTUS, is happening in DC. Well done mate! Couldn’t be happier for you.
I hope he gave you credit.
OOps. I see Scottish Sceptic already covered my concern. But please don’t sue.
I wish he would. It’s a shame Admiral Titley didn’t ask Cruz for the source of that graph.
Admiral Titley: “From Steve Goddard’s blog you say? So if you are elected President, will you use claims from blogs as a source of reliable science information Senator?”
The SOURCE is clearly labeled on the graph. The U.S. Historic Climate Network.
All Tony did is SHOW the RAW vs the Adjusted as any HONEST scientist would.
You just don’t understand. Facts get tainted when they pass through impure hands. By the act of reprinting it, Tony has completely invalidated that graph. Truth isn’t objective. It’s a team sport. And Tony is on the wrong team.
“Who? Whom?”
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov
Hey Ted! Yes, I think you nailed it. CAGW enthusiasts look at “climate science” as a team sport. You are either with them or you are the enemy. Some years back, my brother (who happens to be an alarmist) was stunned when I explained to him (at his request) why I did not think that CAGW was real. Did he attempt to refute either my data or my logic? No! His deep and heartfelt response was “Why, you are on RUSH LIMBAUGH’S side!”
Bullshit. The graph was Tony’s. Tony misrepresented the source data in his dodgy graph.
Your projection can be seen from space! 😆
So you have no issue with annual revisions to data by “the team” for “the cause”, and no issue with “the team” making up fake data for “the cause”, but when Tony posts actual data you throw a fit. Nice!
Hmmm. I suppose you’d try and explain how he misrepresented it, but I’m sure you can’t, so you just stick out your tongue and say he did.
At least Cruz has enough sense not to use graphs from grantologists who cannot produce a single predictive model. Do you always bet on losers?
That’s an important step in the right direction Tony +++++++
Expect more of this.
Cruz is the man, especially if you see the CAGW hoax as a key issue in the upcoming election.
Watched the recording. Great! Now they’re using your graphs, perhaps next you’ll be testifying Tony. BTW Bill Nelson is, was, and always will be a slug.
if Mr Cruz becomes President perhaps Tony Heller replaces James Hansen. That would be a bit ironic.
Great. A US Presidential Candidate uses a graph from a junk-science conspiracy blog.
If he becomes President he can make military decisions based on what his barber tells him.
Another moron who thinks that NOAA data is a conspiracy.
Steve, ceist8’s problem is he can not read the clearly printed legend on the graph because he has a major congenital defect.
http://memeshappen.com/media/created/Head-in-butt-Syndrome-meme-21012.jpg
Another moron who doesn’t understand how someone can totally misrepresent source data in a dodgy graph.
Another moron who doesn’t understand that you can enter data into excel or any other program that presents it graphically, and it doesn’t change the data. So, making a graph of data is misrepresenting it? You are an imbecile.
Notice how ceist8 throws out accusations but does not PROVE anything he is saying.
Typical whiny marxist who thinks if he shuts his eyes and throws a tantrum he can make something come true.
Only a complete moron would average absolute temperatures instead of anomalies and ignore the history of non-climatic changes to weather stations. It’s a moronic as adding up and averaging the times in a bus timetable and expecting anything meaningful. 😀
“It’s a moronic as adding up and averaging the times in a bus timetable and expecting anything meaningful.”
You have pinged GISS, HadGrut etc to a tee.
A meaningless load of GARBAGE. !!
What you need to do is get a close-knit grid from many angles, with minimal local bias.
You know, like the satellite data sets, which can be shown by USA sampling to be very close to the only pristine, evenly spaced surface data that is available.
The GHCN data is a total MESS, partial to zero coverage in many areas, unknown quality of data and data station. Its pointless and irrelevant.
Its good for a US presidential candidate to be highlighting the absolute crapness of the GISS /NOAA fabrication…
Even better, we have a US President who uses imaginary data from junk-science conspiracy grantologists to frighten citizens into giving up liberties.
He makes military decisions based on how he feels about fairness and white privilege.
Did someone say White privilege?
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-pJ2pbx3mWx8/Vp5AygJIowI/AAAAAAABbI4/7rlcvFWRXvU/s1600/White%25252BPrivilege_73b698_4873377%25255B4%25255D.png
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/59/31/4e/59314eeb52ace1ac720d308f38a01b8e.jpg
Well, sure, Gail, why would ceist8 want to trust charts of original NOAA data when he can just as easily get predigested opinions from a website operated by a cartoonist who thinks that Nazi-dress-up is a great lark?
Yes, I can see you prefer swallowing the lunatic junk-science rantings of someone who fraudulently pretended to be a climate scientist called ‘Steve Goddard’ before he got exposed as a fraud. You prefer to gullibly swallow the moronic ideas of someone who thinks adding up and averaging absolute temperatures makes any sense. He could add up the numbers in your local bus timetable and tell you it was an average temperature and you would believe him 😀
ceist8 You would represent a “head in butt syndrome” as presented above, but you’re “butt” is that of a troll.! I gather, you’re one of the gullible morons that also believes the history of Global Warming Predictions came true..?
…………..
Like the Seas have flooded the World’s harbors & Children won’t experience Snow ; plus Ice free Arctic Summers & all the Warmist BS papers that failed spectacularly.
…………..
The Warmist “tampered Data” doesn’t correlate with outcomes… think about it.!
From there , work backwards and you will find the missing link ; your mindset.
This blog is like a mental health facility for scientifically illiterate delusional science deniers suffering from ideologically induced stupidity from only ever reading junk-science conspiracy blogs and gullibly swallowing whatever nutters like Heller and far right shock jocks tell them on Fox entertainment ‘news’. I’m sorry you guys can’t cope with the real world. 😀
“mental health facility for scientifically illiterate delusional”
Gees, looks like we have a new inmate to take care of.
Why does the AGW blob keep sending them?
Poor cesspit hasn’t produced one instance of anything to do with science…
Nor do we expect it to. (gender non-specific)
Tell me, cesspit, do you want to actually get to the science… (and get trounced)
or are you going to just keep yapping like a rabid Chihuahua?
I would assess ceist8 as being a male chihuahua; not sure about rabid, but there’s definitely a form of psychosis, given the nature of the tantrums & OCD trend involving obsessive yapping…
When even a nutjob conspiracy blog like WUWT bans Tony aka the fake Steve Goddard for his dishonest methods, you know it’s bad. 😀
Oh look, another empty fart from the cesspit.
Conspiracy = anybody who disagrees with the Demoncrap party platform