Arctic Melt Forecast

The Arctic Basin is starting to see some melting around the edges.

AnimationImage551

Cold temperatures over the Beaufort Sea will likely keep the melt rate slow over the next two weeks.

2016-06-28060049

10-Day Temperature Outlook

The melt season north of 80N is about one-fourth over, with temperatures persistently below normal, and just above freezing.

2016-06-28062145

Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

Climate experts have been claiming that Greenland is seeing record surface melting this year, but they are lying. Greenland has gained more ice mass than normal since September.

2016-06-28062442

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI

Like all of their other scams, the Arctic meltdown scam has no substance.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Arctic Melt Forecast

    • Lawrenec13 says:

      I can’t see Maue’s tweets because hen banned me years ago for jokingly saying he and Joe B should get a room. Only thing I’ve ever said to him. So what is he saying?

      • RAH says:

        Ryan Maue
        ‏@RyanMaue
        Unusually strong (979 mb) Arctic cyclone orig from Siberia begins period of busy storm track activity in Arctic

        Retweets
        6

        Likes

      • ossqss says:

        Lawrenec13, I don’t use twitter. I just look at it through my browser. You should be able to also if you are not logged in..

  1. AZ1971 says:

    Melt is not the same as surface mass balance. Melt refers to what portion of the ice cap is actually melting, while the latter refers to overall mass lost be it from melting or glacier calving or sublimation.

    • Gonzo says:

      AZ, from the DMI “it snows more than it melts every year”. Calving is the only way the whole of the Greenland ice sheet is not expanding. What Tony shows and alarmists don’t like to hear is that the glaciers are NOT in danger of disappearing anytime soon. So next time you read/see an “alarming” picture of a glacier calving you should be happy. When they stop calving then you should be afraid very afraid.

  2. mogur says:

    “The Arctic Basin is starting to see some melting around the edges.”

    Really? Really? The arctic is starting to see some melting? Are you totally insane, Tony Heller? According to your dozens of posts about how the arctic is not melting this year, and showing that your dithered maps that you claim are proof of your imagined three day melting is nonexistent, you finally see a bit of melting? In the middle of the melting season, with ice at record lows for the date, you finally see a bit of melting? Really?

    Sure, ban me for spamming this site, but ban yourself for spamming your own site with bullshit. Every three days you post a dithered map of short term changes that you think indicates no melting. NOW you are claiming ‘some melting around the edges’? You are about the politics of AGW, definitely not about the science. If you were about science, you would be discussing the relative state of the arctic sea ice, not trying to make exploitative journalism into a shameful record for scientists.

    And you would acknowledge that both opponents and advocates of AGW are from all political, religious, and racial stripes, instead of making this a conspiracy of your perceived enemies.

    • phil jones says:

      Shit… Be as critical of the Arctic Ice Scammers as you are of Tony…

      There is no Catastrophic Melting!!

      Arctic Ice has INCREASED the past few years!!

      Ice Free Arctic Predictions by Major Climate Alarmists have come and gone for 100 years now… WTF?

    • RAH says:

      The concept of time obviously eludes mogur.

    • AndyG55 says:

      “you would be discussing the relative state of the arctic sea ice, ”

      roflmao !!!

      It is you , Jimbo , etc that absolutely REFUSE to acknowledge that the current level of Arctic sea ice is ANOMOLOUSLY HIGH compared to the rest of the current interglacial, (except the LIA which was the coldest period in 10,000 years.)

      You want to talk “relative state” of Arctic Sea Ice, and the AGW farce goes straight out the window…. and you know it.

    • BobbyK says:

      Dude, wtf is your problem?!?! Do you really want to believe that the whole world is going to crap due to climate change and that humanity is doomed?! What kind of sick twisted individual are you?! Do you just hate existence so much that you want it to end or wouldn’t you rather believe that things aren’t as bad as the media is claiming it to be?

      • mogur says:

        There are scientist that want attention. And they say incredibly stupid things.

        But when did I say that the world is going to crap due to climate change, or that humanity is doomed? When did I say that our existence is what the media claims?

        “If you were about science, you would be discussing the relative state of the arctic sea ice, not trying to make exploitative journalism into a shameful record for scientists.” THAT is what I said. Period. I think you need to go back to English class and try to comprehend what I said. Twisting old media into a denigration of current science is reprehensible.

        Tony needs to be fair, not pick out articles that make fun of serious science. Science changes. It is the beauty of science. To try to nail scientists to a 1970’s milepost is silly. And by selective extraction, he distorts the actual historical record. Try to research a bit, and you will find that ‘global warming’ did NOT become ‘climate change’ by the will of a conspiracy.

        • AndyG55 says:

          ““If you were about science, you would be discussing the relative state of the arctic sea ice…. blah, blah…..””

          But you WON’T, WILL YOU. !!!

          COWARDICE is the only conclusion one can come to.

          It is you , Jimbo , etc that absolutely REFUSE to acknowledge that the current level of Arctic sea ice is ANOMOLOUSLY HIGH compared to the rest of the current interglacial, (except the LIA which was the coldest period in 10,000 years.)

        • AndyG55 says:

          “Tony needs to be fair, not pick out articles that make fun of serious science.”

          Yes they do make fun, of what passes as “climate science”..

          A very easy thing to do.

        • AndyG55 says:

          ” a shameful record for scientists”

          Yes, a VERY shameful record for climate scientists.

          The truth can often be like that.

        • AndyG55 says:

          Notice how this low-life P.O.S., mogur, goes after BobbyK, but totally ignores the REALITY of anomalously high Arctic sea ice.

          A coward, straight from the lowest sewer.

          zero science, zero balls, zero integrity.. that is mogur to a tee.

    • Gonzo says:

      [ you would be discussing the relative state of the arctic sea ice,] Here’s the relative state of the Arctic ice, it’s still there and there’s millions of square miles and lots of it over 15ft thick! What is so hard for you to understand? Are all summers, winters, falls, springs the same? Why should Arctic ice stay constant? For gosh sakes we have 36yrs of decent data. Though I do wonder why they haven’t released all of the recovered Nimbus satellite film data going back to the 60’s.

      • mogur says:

        Really? You wonder why early satellite imagery isn’t ‘released’?

        Do you understand the man hours required to process ‘imagery’? There is cloud cover, so only a mosaic of each image could be processed to extract ice edge. The ‘satellite’ record started in 1972 with single channel passive microwave data, that could finally see thru cloud cover.

        This isn’t a conspiracy to hide the earlier data, that data is widely available. Why Tony decided that the only pre-1979 data was an anomaly graph in IPCC 1998 report is obvious. HE wants to hide data freely available. There is a gap between 1973 and 1979, since no microwave satellite was available. That is what Tony is hiding from you. HE wants you to think that scientists cherry picked 1979. No, He did.

        • AndyG55 says:

          “that scientists cherry picked 1979”

          Yes, “climate scientists” do.

          Because starting at 1979 and ignoring the reality of the rest of the Holocene is all they have to promote the BIGGEST scam there ever was.

          And YOU, mogur, are part of that scam

          You must truly DESPISE YOURSELF, with your COWARDICE to admit the reality of the Holocene Arctic sea ice levels.

  3. BobbyK says:

    Sorry, reply was meant for mogur, I get kinda mad when people come on here and argue against Tony

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.