Extreme And Unusual Climate Fraud Continues At Government Agencies

The BBC has just breathlessly reported record warmth in January across much of Africa and South America.

Extreme and unusual’ climate trends continue after record 2016 – BBC News

This is completely fake data. NOAA thermometers show the exact of opposite of the BBC/NOAA claims.

January 2017 Land Only Map

Government climate science and MSM climate reporting is all fake news, all the time.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to Extreme And Unusual Climate Fraud Continues At Government Agencies

  1. Steve Case says:

    They can’t help themselves. They have to hit rock bottom before they decide to tell the truth.

  2. John Plummer says:

    As their theology becomes shakier and shakier their attempted rallying cries become shriller and shriller! It just means the inevitable collapse, when it comes, will be all the more spectacular!

    • SxyxS says:

      The colder it gets the more red color they use .
      (that’s science in the 3rd millenium)

      Maybe they’ll even come up with a new term in 2017 when they run out of red color.
      Climate-Nazi.

  3. Stewart Pid says:

    Notice how the cold covering most of Europe and the cold in northwest US and into Canada manages to disappear on the “adjusted” map!

  4. Norman says:

    Keep the Truth flowing!

  5. frederik wisse says:

    Through belief in the good cause everything is permitted . These fraudsters are considering themselves way above normal human thinking ,manipulating reality into a continued scary picture in order to enslave the rest of society and to rob their fellowmen without giving anything valuable in return . Society should rid itself of this profiteering class , to put it in their grammar . Mr Trump is now making a start with this and you should read the russian pravda journal , which has also an english version in the internet, to experience some straightforward comments .

    • Gail Combs says:

      It is really getting bad when we have to go to Pravda, Russia Today, Sputnik, National Enquirer and GAG… Alex Jones… to get a semblance of real news without the heavy lacing of Progressive Psy-ops.

  6. dave1billion says:

    I drilled down into the links and the map that the BBC uses with a header of “.. Departures from the Long Term Average this Year” is actually NOAA’s map that shows the purported deviation from the norm for the entire year of 2016 .

    In addition, the date on the map is Jan 17, 2017. Even if it had been a map pointing to January deviations, it’s hard to say that using data for just over half a month would be valid. That’s really shoddy and it’s obvious that it was written (or edited) by someone with a poor understanding of science.

    That was a REALLY poorly written/edited article.

    • neal s says:

      The end result of either a sloppy article, or a lying one is pretty much the same. In the past I might have given the benefit of doubt, but the mistakes or lies are so bad that I don’t think any MSM deserve benefit of doubt any longer. I am confident that the CAGW fraud will be shown to be a lie long before the Arctic icecap melts. But just like some people still believe in a flat earth despite all evidence to the contrary, there will be ‘bitter clingers’ to the CAGW lie.

      Sad, but there are plenty of people unwilling to use their own brains.

    • AndyG55 says:

      Yep, Thanks Dave… I suspected that it was a BBC fake-news farce.

      Need to find the actual NOAA map for January land and sea before dumping it in NOAA’s lap.

  7. eliza says:

    I live in southern south america and can definitely attest that we have had a COOLER summer than usual down here.

  8. CheshireRed says:

    What exactly is this ‘extreme and unusual’ climate trends they speak of, and where is it causing anything unusual beyond the fact earth’s climate is always shifting? Arctic ice declining over a long term and a tiny, incremental warming across the past 160 years or so, and erm, that seems about it. In what way does this otherwise benign weather justify………;

    ‘……….challenging the limits of our understanding of the climate system. We are now in truly uncharted territory’

    This is hyperbolic rhetoric on steroids, not rational assessment of insignificant shifts in weather. Or in plain speaking, complete and utter bullshit.

  9. R. de Haan says:

    Can’t wait for Trump to really pull the plugg on this nonsense.
    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/03/21/government-websites-break-their-own-rules-to-cater-to-climate-cult/

    I’m losing my patience.

    • Gail Combs says:

      The Uni-Party and DC Swamp critters are gunning for Trump and hope to impeach him. IF they can manage to get the Russian Tampering in the Election to stick and toss out Trump’s win as a result, the installation of the Hilderbeast as President has been floated.

      One of the more amusing comments from a disgusted commenter at the Conservative Tree House
      When they go after Trump, they should decide whether they want to go Western style, under the oak tree, or a French …hair cut.
      The response was
      “An old fashioned “neck tie party” broadcast live on CNN would be most effective.” and it went down hill from there (for the Congress Offal).

      Ordinary people are NOT amused by the DC shenanigans or the Leftist Snowflake temper tantrums. The increase in profits for Chick-fil-A, Ivanka’s brand and L.L. Bean compared to the bombing of Macy, Target, Kellogg’s and Starbucks should give the Congress Offal a BIG CLUE as to who is the larger group and who is actually more angry.

      Rasmussen, January 09, 2017 GOP Voters More Aligned With Trump Than Congress

  10. Psalmon says:

    I’m reading that NASAs Earth Science budget under Trump is only cut 1.9 to $1.8B…so I guess we will be seeing a never ending stream of cartoons like this.

    Further, advisors were recommending reorganizing the NASA science budget under NOAA (at the least offering the opportunity to dismiss overlapping personnel), but it is not in the bill.

    If true, all terribly disappointing.

    http://www.theverge.com/2017/3/17/14947444/trump-budget-plan-cuts-nasa-asteroid-mission-europa

    • Steven Fraser says:

      1.9 to 1.8 B is still $-100million.

      Restructuring/retasking of NASAnand NOAA would not be done in a budget bill, esp not the first budget in a long time.

      I will be watching to see what congress does with the baseline bump of $900B+ that has been carried forward invisibly with the continuing resolutions.

    • neal s says:

      Please remember that Trump has only just taken office and that the GOP is riddled with RINOs and it is very difficult to make too big changes at the outset. By this time next year, it should be more feasible to have deeper cuts where warranted and a much more appropriate budget. One of the things necessary is to get bunch of dead weight out of many agencies and eliminate unions in federal public service. Being able to have Trump (and selected others within his administration) call people into the office and say ‘You’re Fired!’, will be an essential step in being able to reign in those who would oppose the plan to MAGA.

      And Trump may be hampered by RINOs from doing all that we might like him to do. So we must remember to inform our representatives that if they will not support Trump in MAGA, that we will replace them with those who will.

      To this end, the 2018 elections might be critical for eliminating enough demonrats and RINO rebooblicans and replacing them with those who will help Trump and not do all they can to hinder, so that Trump can actually do those things that must be done for the swamp to be adequately drained so that better progress towards MAGA may be made.

  11. AndyG55 says:

    I assume Tony will be showing this piece of farcical fabrication to the powers that be in the US.

    Check that is not just a BBC mock-up first though. They have been known to do that sort of thing.

    It would be interesting to see what the actual NOAA land and sea looks like.

  12. AndyG55 says:

    January NOAA.
    Doesn’t look like have changed a whole lot of blue to red.
    Some, but not as blatant as they have been sometimes.

    Most of what they have “in-filled/ fabricated”, is pink, though.

  13. R. de Haan says:

    Here’s an article about BOM caught in the act of manipulating data.
    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/03/10/australian-bureau-of-meterology-evidence-of-revision-of-solar-exposure-data-for-2013/

    Totally fed up with the entire bunch of hacks engaged in corrupting science to further their insane political aganda.

  14. CO2isLife says:

    Tony, I thought this one might trigger some ideas for you.
    Climate “Science” on Trial; Did Cosmic Rays End the CA Drought?
    https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/03/22/climate-science-on-trial-did-cosmic-rays-end-the-ca-drought/

Leave a Reply to CheshireRed Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.