Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Bob G on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- John Francis on Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- conrad ziefle on Earth, Wind And Fire
- GW on Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- GW on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- arn on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Gordon Vigurs on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Gordon Vigurs on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Denis Rushworth on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
It’s actually not a terrible theory, considering.
Neither was his notion that a warmer, CO2-enriched Earth would be better for people and for plants.
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
It’s pretty elaborate, given the evidence available at the time, & no more “scientific” than an Edgar Rice Burroughs novel. I mean, it’s all very well & good for scientists to speculate like they’ve been eating jimson weed, but it would be polite for them to mention the fact before attaching their name to the output.