Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Steve
O/T but FYI
http://www.couriermail.com.au/technology/peter-gwynne-reporter-who-wrote-story-about-global-cooling-is-a-climate-change-believer-after-all/story-fnjww4h4-1226800020634
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.
“When I wrote this story I did not see it as a blockbuster,” Gwynne told the site. “It was just an intriguing piece about what a certain group in a certain niche of climatology was thinking.”
If he lives long enough he’ll be saying the same about global warming.
Surprisingly, no mention whatsoever in the article about Ewing and Donn, whose Theory of Ice Ages (presupposing an open Arctic) was still very much current in 1969!
Gone are the days when the weather was the end-of-newscast 3-5 minute “forecast” that was the subject of so many jokes and derision. (and deservedly so)
Now, with the hunger of the 24-hour weather coverage for “content”, any nimrod with a scarey story gets coverage. Facts aren’t required, just a scarey soundbite.. And every one of these so-called scientists reach the exact same conclusion: “we need more money”.
With their accuracy track record, and the extreme difficulty of burying their past (though they are indeed trying), these clowns (“climate scientists”) should once again be the target of the derisive jokes. It just isn’t happening fast enough for me.
They should be the target of criminal investigations.
Exaggerated and fraudulent global warming claims in the name of “science” (funding) have been circulating for a long time. Over 45 years and countless billions wasted, it is time to shut the funding down completely..