On Monday, the Inquirer reported that in 59 of Philadelphia’s “divisions” — these are subsets of wards, wherein fewer than 1,000 people might be registered to vote — GOP nominee Mitt Romney failed to win even a single vote. Collectively, the votes for Obama across these divisions added up to 19,605, to Romney’s zero
.“The polling across the nation showed that the African-American community was supporting the president by about 98, 99 percent,” Sestak told Fox News. “I think the people voted the way they believe in.”
Pa. officials plan no probe despite extraordinary turnout, totals for Obama in Philly | Fox News
The odds of this election result being legitimate are ……. zero.
As the Commies use to say ” it doesn’t matter how gets the votes it only matters who counts the votes.”
Results are never legitimate when your person does not win :p
Andy
😆 well ya reap what you sow thar Andy…… So don’t complain later because this is what you wanted…..
That could be true, however, the chances of a 100% vote for a particular candidate in 59 districts in Phily, AND, 100% vote in 7 districts in Ohio, is statistically IMPOSSIBLE … The margin of error forbids it! … there is no way on earth that there was not 1 vote cast for Romney out of all those votes cast. Absolutely and unequivocally IMPOSSIBLE!
A unanimous result is impossible in a sample size that large. Again, you have no idea what you are talking about.
No, that’s just cynical. There are dozens of Oiho precincts where the same results are being puzzled over. Let’s look back a couple of election cycles when sore losers took the results to court, if you want to talk about legitimate results and pouting.
The War of the Insane Left, the 2012 campaign, on the Eastern Front….All quiet (move along).
Even Hitler never did that well, even with rigged elections.