Numbers don’t lie. Planet heating up – Ellwood City Ledger: Eric Poole
Actually, people use incorrect numbers to lie all the time. Many other people are just plain stupid.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
Recent Comments
- arn on The Clock Is Ticking
- Mike Peinsipp on The Clock Is Ticking
- arn on The Clock Is Ticking
- dm on “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- D. Boss on The Clock Is Ticking
- William on The Clock Is Ticking
- arn on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- arn on The Clock Is Ticking
- Gordon Vigurs on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Disillusioned on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
Numbers don’t lie; they’re adjusted by people who do.
Over what period of time does he think the world is warming. 1 day? one year? 100 years? 1000 years? 10,000 years? 100,000 years? 1,000,000 Two out of seven might find a slight warming that is statistically insignificant, but the rest were most likely warmer than what we are experiencing.
Eric Poole’s checkered employment history, which includes stints at a gun range, as a steelworker and in the food service industry. Since getting his first grown-up newspaper job at the age of 30..
Of course, with a background like that, if he was taking up the sceptic side of the argument he would get howled down with:
“He’s not a climate scientist! Where’s his peer review?”
Apparently any asshole can be a qualified “climate scientist” these days.
“Stuipid” is the word you’re looking for.
🙂
Sort of reminds me of the eco worrier who came here and kept reminding everyone he only “quotes facts”. Nothing wrong with the facts he quoted. The problem was with all the surrounding facts he had edited out of his quotes.
Numbers don’t lie and guns don’t kill – the people using them do.
But liars do. Time to consider the source.
This graph says it all:
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/1-s2-0-s0921818112001658-gr11.jpg?w=640&h=373