Obama promised to make America green in 2013, and he succeeded.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- arn on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Bob G on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Disillusioned on Seventeen Years Of Fun
- conrad ziefle on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Luigi on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- arn on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- conrad ziefle on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
woops…..Nasa says CO2 reflects heat…..now what???
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
Now NASA can argue with NASA about who is right!
It also means that one portion of NASA is a denier, the question is, Which one?
My money is on GISS!
I have yet to get an answer from anyone on how much heat in the atmosphere is conducted. However, it appears obvious any energy which is conducted to a GHG molecule, from a non GHG molecule, then that radiating GHG would effectively cool as compared to a non radiating non GHG molecule. In affect any GHG in the atmosphere potentially shortens the residence time of any conducted energy which it recieves.
Watts shows Principia may be playing fast and loose with the summary. That does not mean that CO2 does not have cooling properties, but I would not start quoting Principia on this just yet.
He’s making America green while stealing the working American citizen’s green. Looks like he’s losing one of his left wing allies, however: “Rendell: Learn to Love Fracking,” (Philadelphia Inquirer).
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/Rendell_Learn_to_Love_Fracking_ProPublica.html
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/yes-fracking-n-y-article-1.1299789
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.