Hansen 2011 – “Many Meters Of Sea Level Rise Under “Business As Usual Scenarios”

4 Responses to Hansen 2011 – “Many Meters Of Sea Level Rise Under “Business As Usual Scenarios”

1. R. de Haan says:

   January 14, 2014 at 4:10 am

   Besides the links you provide we have some people who dug in the data and who performed an amazing job to proof AGW is a SCAM: Anthony Watts Surface Stations Project that shows that the entire temperature increase over the past decades is smaller than the error margin of the individual surface stations.

   We had ClimateGate a giant e-mail and data leak providing inside information that tells us AGW IS A SCAM and we have the work from E. M. Smith who performed an incredible job perfectly presented in an interview between Coleman and E. M. Smith:

   Anthony Watts Surface Statiion Project, The ClimateGate data links and interviews like the one with Smith should have a permanent presence at any skeptical web site because it is human nature to forget really bad things that happened very quickly. So we continue to invent the wheel for second, the third and the fourth time. And that brings us in a situation where we have an article from Dr. Ira Glickstein at WUWT telling is Global Warming is Real but not a big deal.
   http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/01/12/global-warming-is-real-but-not-a-big-deal-2/

   I think an article like that is a smack in the face of those who already know AGW is the biggest pile of hog wash ever.

   For those skeptics who are aroun for some time now refresh your memory and for those who are relative new to the subject, watch these two video’s and tell me if AGW is real or not:

   http://www.kusi.com/story/13257664/full-unedited-interview-with-e-michael-smith#

   Reply
   • Jason Calley says:

     January 14, 2014 at 3:54 pm

     Anyone who thinks that CAGW is not a scam (and by that I mean that it is not merely erroneous, but is consciously fraudulent) should go to E.M.s blog and read his analysis of how GIStemp works.
     http://chiefio.wordpress.com/gistemp/

     Reply
     • Jason Calley says:

       January 14, 2014 at 4:17 pm

       By the way, I am making no claim as to what Mr. Smith’s opinion is or is not, as far as fraud vs human error. I only say that his analysis can stand on its own merits.

       Reply
2. Steve Case says:

   January 14, 2014 at 9:25 am

   If you generate the numbers necessary to reproduce Hansen’s red curve found in
   Figure 7 Page 14 of
   Paleoclimate Implications for Human-Made Climate Change – Hansen/Sato (DATE?)
   that you linked to, you will find that those last numbers that represent December 2099 show sea level rise going up at the astonishing rate of 1 mm/day.

   How can anyone believe this stuff?

   The series I generated starts with:

   2000 ; 4.88
   2001 ; 5.23
   2002 ; 5.6
   2003 ; 6.01

   and ends with:

   2097 ; 4061
   2098 ; 4352
   2099 ; 4665
   2100 ; 5000

   Reply