The 1940’s blip was messing up their fake global warming theory, so the Climategate team simply got rid of it.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- Latest Research In Climate Science
- UK Sucking Carbon
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
Recent Comments
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- Francis Barnett on UK Sucking Carbon
- oeman50 on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Gamecock on Latest Research In Climate Science
- arn on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- gordon vigurs on Latest Research In Climate Science
The 2009 Climategate emails that surfaced in Nov 2009 were but the tip of a deep iceberg of government deception that flourished out of sight in the lush funds of federal research agencies after WWII.
Thank you, Steven, for your courage in confronting this institutional deception.
The decision in 1945 to hide neutron repulsion – the source of energy that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki – damaged the integrity of almost all physical sciences.
Worse yet, the agreement to deceive the public destroyed the integrity of constitutional governments world-wide.
“Oh what a tangled web we weave
When first we practice to deceive.”
Slightly off topic but….
Hello again Hockey Stick, goodbye global Medieval Warming Period.
These are the conclusions of a multi-proxy 1000-year climate reconstruction published today (March 31) in Nature Climate Change, by Dr Raphael Neukom of the Oeschger Centre at the University of Bern, and Dr Joelle Gergis of the University of Melbourne.
Dr Neukom summed up for a University of Melbourne press release:
“The study showed the ‘Medieval Warm Period’, as identified in some European chronicles, was a regional phenomenon.
During the same period, temperatures in the Southern Hemisphere were only average. Our study revealed it was not a common climate event that many people have previously assumed.”
The paper claims that in 99.7 percent of the results, the warmest decade of the millennium occurred after 1970.
Of course the 1940’s blip is gone as well!
http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/zombie-science-gergis-et-al-disinterred-for-remake/
The hockey stick graph was only for the Northern Hemisphere. The graph was titled Northern Hemisphere Temperature reconstruction. Everyone seems to forget that. So this recent study says that the Mideaval Warm period was also, just the Northern Hemisphere. There are pleanty of studies that counterdict that assertion.
Yes there are plenty of studies that contradict this assertion. It’s just amazing that this paper tries to diminish the MWP again without reference to them.
Steven McIntyre and company are on it. If there is any hanky-panky this thing will be thoroughly eviscerated in short order.
http://climateaudit.org/2014/03/31/neukom-and-gergis-serve-cold-screened-spaghetti/
Steven McIntyre!
Wow! and good luck to him!
OH MY…
The Attack squad is going into action.
Cooling in the 1940’s and 50’s confirmed by Nenana Ice Classic.
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/57699914
“It was the thirty-sixth lottery and the twenty seventh time the thaw had come in May. The other nine thaws occurred in April.”
nenana Ice Classic competition has been going for over 10,000 years
http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/53458826
Is there an online source for the 1975 National Academy of Sciences graph?
Marine scientists prove that Indian Ocean temperatures have nothing to do with CO2.
Models in a study on WA corals alledge a steady rise in SST’s off WA since 1800. Whether the models hind cast correctly is unknown, but if CO2 wasn’t causing the global warming between 1800 and 1970 then what did?
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140401/ncomms4607/full/ncomms4607.html
Who can we trust?
“The sudden drop in temperatures in 1945 now appears to be an artefact of a switch from using mainly US ships to collect sea surface temperature data to using mainly UK ships. The two fleets used a different method. The temperature record is currently being updated to reflect this bias, but in essence it means that the cooling after 1940 was more gradual and less pronounced than previously thought.”
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11639-climate-myths-the-cooling-after-1940-shows-co2-does-not-cause-warming.html
Buckets to blame for wartime temperature blip
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14006-buckets-to-blame-for-wartime-temperature-blip.html