In 1993, scientists reported that there was no warming in South America.
In 1999, NASA reported that there was no warming in the US
So where was the warming occurring? NASA doesn’t have any long term data for most of the land surface outside of the US and Europe. Global warming is completely fake.
How did you reach your conclusion here? You’re completely cherry-picking from that 1999 NASA article, which goes on to say “However, North Atlantic cooling is also a predicted consequence of the transient growth of greenhouse gases. ”
The author, James Hansen, who I’ve noticed you often reference, is not a climate change skeptic. Not even close. He often speaks of the danger of manmade climate change: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/07/20/climate-seer-james-hansen-issues-his-direst-forecast-yet.html
This site is an absolute sham, as is its author.
Moron alert
please excuse a basic question
if CO2 has the alleged effect of blocking heat from leaving the surface of the planet
how does it not block heat coming in as well?
if there is not real physics for this, I wonder what the warmunist explanation is
Wavelengths are much longer going out than coming in.
There’s still nearly half of TSI that is longwave.
“if CO2 has the alleged effect of blocking heat from leaving the surface of the planet”
CO2 does NOT block heat from leaving the surface.
It absorbs most of it within the first 10m or so and transfers it to the other 99.96% of molecules as part of the REGULATION process of the atmosphere.
http://lasersparkpluginc.com/uploads/CO2_Absorption_Data.pdf
Reblogged this on Climate Collections.