Government experts say that the last few months were the hottest ever.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- Gordon Vigurs on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- Luigi on 70C At Lisbon
- Richard E Fritz on Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- D. Boss on Cheering Crowds
- D. Boss on Cheering Crowds
- D. Boss on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
If they seriously believed their own claims, editors of NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE would have sent the following paper to their consensus scientists for review.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy2.pdf
Instead, they rejected the paper without sending it out for review.
That has nothing to do with this topic.
I just read over on The Libertarian Republic that NASA is dedicating staff time to arguing about climate change on social media. I believe it was here that I read of coercive attempts–on the part of other sinkholes for tax dollars–to silence criticism of meterological data doctoring.
There was a time when I was really proud of NASA…
Weirdly enough, I just ran into the Linzen video on Facebook of all places – where I believe there is a ban on anything anti-warmunist. Of course I liked it. And sure, let’s argue about climate change on social media; we’ll cream them. If these cockroaches are actually desperate enough to venture out into the light of day they will be annihilated.
Tony/Steve….journal Nature says you’ve been right all along!
Global warming has made the weather better for most in U.S.
http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-climate-change-weather-america-20160420-story.html
Recent improvement and projected worsening of weather in the United States
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v532/n7599/full/nature17441.html
Global Warming: Just another term for nice weather.
The warmunists are having conniption fits over the article. Too little doom and gloom is bad PR for the cause.
The alarmists desperately try to hide the “Dirty 30’s” from the public, the decade that produced unprecedented heat that has not even been approached in many places during recent years. Not with respect to intensity, duration or geographical extent. They were totally in a class by themselves.
The alarmist propaganda mill would have you believe that the “Dust Bowl” was a localized Mann-made event in Oklahoma, caused by ignorant straight, white males defiling the environment with their evil plowing methods. It is not portrayed as the widespread extreme heat that affected almost everyone, from coast to coast and from border to border and beyond.