Government experts say that the last few months were the hottest ever.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
Recent Comments
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Jack the Insider on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
If they seriously believed their own claims, editors of NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE would have sent the following paper to their consensus scientists for review.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy2.pdf
Instead, they rejected the paper without sending it out for review.
That has nothing to do with this topic.
I just read over on The Libertarian Republic that NASA is dedicating staff time to arguing about climate change on social media. I believe it was here that I read of coercive attempts–on the part of other sinkholes for tax dollars–to silence criticism of meterological data doctoring.
There was a time when I was really proud of NASA…
Weirdly enough, I just ran into the Linzen video on Facebook of all places – where I believe there is a ban on anything anti-warmunist. Of course I liked it. And sure, let’s argue about climate change on social media; we’ll cream them. If these cockroaches are actually desperate enough to venture out into the light of day they will be annihilated.
Tony/Steve….journal Nature says you’ve been right all along!
Global warming has made the weather better for most in U.S.
http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-climate-change-weather-america-20160420-story.html
Recent improvement and projected worsening of weather in the United States
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v532/n7599/full/nature17441.html
Global Warming: Just another term for nice weather.
The warmunists are having conniption fits over the article. Too little doom and gloom is bad PR for the cause.
The alarmists desperately try to hide the “Dirty 30’s” from the public, the decade that produced unprecedented heat that has not even been approached in many places during recent years. Not with respect to intensity, duration or geographical extent. They were totally in a class by themselves.
The alarmist propaganda mill would have you believe that the “Dust Bowl” was a localized Mann-made event in Oklahoma, caused by ignorant straight, white males defiling the environment with their evil plowing methods. It is not portrayed as the widespread extreme heat that affected almost everyone, from coast to coast and from border to border and beyond.