The New York Times says global warming was settled science and beyond debate by the late 1970’s – based on data collected during the prior thirty years.
Nearly everything we understand about global warming was understood in 1979. By that year, data collected since 1957 confirmed what had been known since before the turn of the 20th century: Human beings have altered Earth’s atmosphere through the indiscriminate burning of fossil fuels. The main scientific questions were settled beyond debate.
Losing Earth: The Decade We Almost Stopped Climate Change – The New York Times
They had a slightly different story in the late 1970’s.
International Team of Specialists Finds No End in Sight to 30‐Year Cooling Trend in Northern Hemisphere
Most people saw Orwell’s novel “1984” as a warning, but the New York Times saw it as an instruction manual.
The phossils of the New York Times are nowadays only paper tigers . When will their witch-hunt become real ?
Before kick-off at 18:00 on Saturday temperatures pitchside showed -14.9C (5.18F), which was agonizingly short of the -15C limit which means teams have the right to cancel matches, TASS reports.
The windchill factor reportedly made the actual temperature feel as low as -25C, as heavily-padded players braved the cold to play out a 1-1 draw.
https://www.rt.com/sport/445341-russian-premier-league-yenisey-akhmat-freezing/
Meanwhile in Paris.
https://youtu.be/Gft_eVwpRSE?list=PL-F2bd60_9Dylw0fKMuDIRJqoTtLJ_Y10
300 Dutch churches sounded the “Climate alarm bell” at 2 minutes to 12
https://barendrechtsdagblad.nl/kerken-luiden-noodklok-voor-klimaat/
“Comrade,you are factually wrong.”
“Doesn’t matter as long as i am politically correct”
It will take a long recovery, one bell at a time.
The Enemy of Humanity
https://www.campaigncc.org/main_campaigns
With the usual panic message.
https://www.campaigncc.org/currentimpacts
Propaganda is strong at that site.
‘Nearly everything we understand about global warming was understood in 1979. By that year, data collected since 1957 confirmed what had been known since before the turn of the 20th century’
That is preposterous. Before satellite measurement began in 1979, there was no comprehensive data.
‘This narrative by Nathaniel Rich is a work of history, addressing the 10-year period from 1979 to 1989: the decisive decade when humankind first came to a broad understanding of the causes and dangers of climate change.’
Alternative history.
He told them everything he knew and they still know nothing ….lol
“A wise man’s heart inclines him toward the right, but a fool’s heart toward the left.”
Your a poet
there fore you”re :)
Ecclesiastes 10.2 or something.
Nathaniel Rich is a trained parrot:
“Dangers of climate change, dangers of climate change.”