The Guardian ignores the opinion of the half of American Meteorological Society members who are climate skeptics, but considers the climate opinion of James Cameron or any other celebrity hack to be front page news.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Perhaps they are ‘The Guardian’ of misinformation, Half truths, out right lies, and of course of their own comments sections when it comes to “deniers”?
Actors and writers of stories are obvious liars..
They ‘think’? I thought one progressive emotes and the rest follow.
Of course the Guardian likes James Cameron. After all, they all work in the same business — make believe!