Strong amounts of recent urban warming have corrupted the temperature record, and forced NASA experts to further warm the newer urban regions, and further cool the older more rural areas. If this seems counter intuitive, that is simply because your paycheck doesn’t depend on pushing a particular agenda.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- dearieme on COP29 Preview
- Greg in NZ on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- arn on UK Labour To Save The Planet
- Tel on UK Labour To Save The Planet
- dm on CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- D. Boss on Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Robertvd on UK Labour To Save The Planet
I notice that NASA today launched a satellite to study soil moisture levels to help to deal with floods and droughts. Call me a neanderthal but is that really something we can’t do without? You can’t effectively, and much less expensively, study soil moisture levels from right here on terra firma?
Easier to fake it from space
Yeah, and also, by measuring from space, the data is not watered down (!) by looking at deeper soil horizons or anything like that.
This is yet again another “instrument” designed to yell “fire” in a crowded theater. From the “Science” part of the mission site, emphasis mine:
It doesn’t get any better when you read how this thing’s supposed to work it’s even worse. From the “Instrument” part of the mission site, emphasis mine:
Accurate estimates? And this thing will be smart enough to tell the difference between wet grass and wet dirt… I’m not buying any of it. Maybe it would work on a desert but anywhere else is gonna be a crap shoot. And I got to help pay for it…. Arghhhh!
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2015/01/31/some-more-trouble-with-temperatures-and-nice-analysis/
Some good articles here game over now
Also important if a station cools, remove it just like the Melbourne station was because started cooling too much surrounded by concrete buildings. New form of “Science”
Melbourne and surrounds have hundreds of temperature monitors. Loosing one due to an issue will not make any difference.
More funding = More bullshit outta NASA…
Progressives always refer to “the Science” without ever daring to look into it themselves… 2014 Coldest Year Ever??… How?… These tools demand we deny the obvious… Accelerating Sea Level Rise while the Planet grows more and more ICE??… Total Garbage …
How much snow will fall in Boston?
http://earth.nullschool.net/#2015/02/02/0900Z/wind/surface/level/overlay=total_cloud_water/orthographic=-96.26,33.36,1581