I don’t remember seeing any discussion of hunting in the Declaration of Independence.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
Recent Comments
- Allan Shelton on NASA Sea Level
- Disillusioned on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Ulric Lyons on Technology Advances
- oeman50 on NASA Sea Level
- Gordon Vigurs on NASA Sea Level
- Lasse on NASA Sea Level
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
And at the time these men risked it all, by signing our declaration, one could bear exactly the same “military style weaponry” that standing armies carried. That was intentional. The only hunting they wanted to protect was the hunt for individual liberty.
NY is going to limit clips to 7 bullets. I had an idea to stop people from imbibing too much. Ban bottles of booze larger than a liter. Unless a person is stopped, how many clips can he go through? It’s all for show to try and shut-up the anti-gun nuts.
It works just as well as limiting the size of soda cups.
Bloomberg seems obsessed with limiting the size of other men’s appendages. He must have been laughed at once by TSA employees operating body scanners.