In 1982, NASA showed just over three inches (8 cm) of sea level rise from 1880 to 1980. They also showed a sharp slowdown in sea level rise rates after 1950.
Three inches isn’t very scary, so the EPA has doubled that figure, and shows six inches of sea level rise from 1880 to 1980 – with completely fake acceleration after 1950.
Trends in global average absolute sea level, 1870-2008 (US EPA) – Sea level rise
This graph overlays the two graphs at the same scale. The EPA data is political, not scientific.
Tide gauges show a slowdown in sea level rise rates, so government propaganda agencies tamper with them and now simply ignore them, instead using incredibly poor interpretations of satellite data since 1993. But even this data is being tampered with over time.
In 2004, the University of Colorado (who got beaten up by Oregon yet again last night) showed sea level rise rate of 2.8 mm/year, with an error of +/- 0.4.
http://sealevel.colorado.edu/2004_rel1.2/sl_cu2004_rel1.2.pdf
That wasn’t very scary, so they have since changed the data and moved it outside of their own error bars to 3.3 mm/year, using a Global Isostatic Adjustment which is 100% fraudulent in the context of sea surface height. That adjustment was intended to calculate ocean depth as the sea floor sinks, but has no bearing on the accuracy of measurement of sea level by satellites.
The image below overlays them at the same scale. The University of Colorado simply altered the data to make it look a little scarier.
But here is the real smoking gun of fraud from the IPCC.
In 1990 the IPCC said :
there is no convincing evidence of an acceleration in global sea level rise during the twentieth century
there is weak evidence for an acceleration over the last 2-3 centuries
In the 2013 report, they say the exact opposite
The 2013 IPCC report (AR5) concluded, “there is high confidence that the rate of sea level rise has increased during the last two centuries, and it is likely that GMSL (Global Mean Sea Level) has accelerated since the early 1900’s
Very little of what you hear about the climate from government or academia has any validity. They are simply fabricating data for political and monetary purposes. It is a $29 billion dollar per year RICO style racket, and the biggest scam in history.
.png){kind=link}
Is it possible to get a U of C 2006 SL screen shot from right before they stopped updating and came back with a four year flat period erased?
me thinks the biggest US-weapon that exist these days is neither the a or the h-bomb but the hockey stick.
Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
Another classic example of Government sanctioned climate propaganda, and the flagrant abuse of “science” to push the man-made “global (non) warming” agenda…
Typo. It should read “C-Level Rise”, and it refers to the current crop of climate scientists, their academic accomplishments, and their unwarranted media status
Mediocracy.
In spades. I never realized how stupid some of these academics, reporters, politicians and teachers are.
I really wish we had an alpha male to vote for similar to Putin. I do not think we have had a decent alpha male in the white house since Ike. Certainly not the current crop.
https://youtu.be/r33QRd2yDIE
– Dr Tim Ball PhD – – Globalist Eugenicide Green Agenda 21 of DEATH
A description of an UN Agenda 21 Transit Village by a ‘Flaming Liberal’.
Reblogged this on WeatherAction News.
Good post on this at WUWT also: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/03/an-open-invitation-to-ira-flatow/
Steven aka Tony, you and your readers are invited to answer the question: Did Sir Fred Hoyle “blow the cover”on Stalin’s BIGGEST LIE in his 1994 autobiography ?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Did_Sir_Fred_Hoyle_BLOW_THE_COVER_ON_THE_BIGGEST_LIE_in_STALINS_SCIENCE
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/281017812
That has nothing to do with this topic
But what if they run out of others people’s money ? How stupid of me, they already did.
https://therightthingblog.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/us-federal-debt-by-president-political-party.jpg
This is what I call a hockey stick.
Yes, we have been creating a false prosperity through ever increasing debt since the 1980’s. Both political parties have had their hands in it pretty equally. To me it seems like a house of cards, ready to collapse in the not too distant future.
This philosophy of not raising enough revenue, but never cutting benefits is a road to ruin. You can keep living on credit for only so long.
Don’t worry they are planning a reset with a war between us and China and Russia. Given Clinton gave China our military technology and we are vastly out numbered plus we have imported 1.6 million militant muslims, guess who loses this time?
And which means you can better fake the past (and future) than you can the near present – Geez!
And places where normal people can’t go like the deep ocean or the poles.
As usual, well researched, well written.
Many thanks for all your good work,
w.
Willis, see my reply below
Thanks for looking into past publications from Colorado U’s Sea Level Research Group.(SLRG)
On that note if you plug the URL for CU’s SLRG into the Way Back Machine the data from ten years ago is there. It’s the 2nd oldest snap shot. The rate ten years ago as shown by analysis of that data was 2.6 mm per year. Today the same time series from 1992 to 2004 yields 3.5 mm per year.
Plain and simple, The historical record has been rewritten.
That was the way Stalin controlled science in the old USSR.
That is the way science is controlled worldwide today. Welcome to “1984” !.
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/281017812
That has nothing to do with this topic
Time to yell him in no uncertain terms…
…. that ENOUGH is ENOUGH
Fort Denison is one of the oldest tidal records (if not the oldest) in the southern hemisphere. The fort is open to the ocean but protected in Sydney Harbour, so it doesn’t need to deal with wild seas.
It virtually mirrors the 1982 NASA data. I don’t get how NASA can say that the oceans are rising a 3mm/yr and say it with a straight face. They must have been botoxed all over.
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.htm?stnid=680-140
https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/captain-cook-cms-assets/assets/images-syd-870×580/81/sg-fortd2_large.jpg
Been there.. done coffee under those brollies 🙂
Beautiful spot.
Made by convicts from Hawkesbury sandstone and built on the same as bedrock, 300 plus metres deep, (when I was 18, I worked underneath it down a deep coal mine) The sand was deposited by a massive Amazon like ancient river system that crossed much of Antarctica and Australia when it was joined to Antarctica. So Sydney is actually built on ancient Antarctica.
Brisbane, Australia, sea level hasn’t moved at all since 1960. It’s geology is different to Sydney but there is no CO2 signal in the data.
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.htm?stnid=680-078
Southern Africa and Spain (being reasonably geologically stable) also show 0 to 0.6 ish sea level rise. And yet the same weighting on the global calculation is given to geologically unstable places – Iceland, Alaska, southern state of USA, Brazil, West Africa, Chile & Peru? To come up with a global number and connect it to CO2, is simply unscientific and fraudulent.
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.htm?stnid=427-001
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.htm?stnid=220-031
When it comes to Florida and sea level, you have to calculate the uplift of the state from loss of mass, due to the huge amount of material lost all the time. The limestone is always being dissolved by the underground rivers here, meaning Florida is actually rising from the sea, estimated at an inch a century. This figure is an estimate only.
“The limestone is always being dissolved by the underground rivers here, meaning Florida is actually rising from the sea, estimated at an inch a century.”
An inch a century? How cool! I have spent a lot of time underground in Florida caves and I can attest that the limestone is often exceedingly weak and soft. Scratch your name into the stone with your fingernail? Easy! Heck, some areas are harder than others, but there are places where you can actually scoop out pieces of limestone with your hand. Doesn’t take much to dissolve and wear it away.
The other thing with Florida, is it is always gaining ground with the barrier islands. On the backside, mangroves constantly create soil. They actually cause the land to form. On the beach side, wind and storms deposit more sand, which a healthy dune system captures, and the dunes grow. Even a really big storm event will dump sand far back into the dune, causing it to actually gain height. Untouched dunes (National parks) are huge. And if a big storm breaches them, it just adds sand to the island.
Of course where humans have screwed up the dunes, it’s a different story.
“Of course where humans have screwed up the dunes, it’s a different story.”
Yeah, I saw that documentary movie about the war on Arrakis. And those giant worms! Ewwwwww!
🙂
I thought the first first ‘Dune’ was by far the best. The remake sucked.
Reblogged this on Roald j. Larsen.