The EPA’s highest-paid employee and a leading expert on climate change deserves to go to prison for at least 30 months for lying to his bosses and saying he was a CIA spy working in Pakistan so he could avoid doing his real job, say federal prosecutors.
Climate change expert’s fraud was ‘crime of massive proportion,’ say feds – Investigations
Perhaps Peter Gleick, fraudster and head of the AGU ethics committee, can sort him out.
h/t to Marc Morano
From the article: said Beale was driven “to manipulate those around him through the fabrication of grandiose narratives … that are fueled by his insecurities.”
Sounds like a perfect resume for a climate change expert.
If you’re collecting a check by “advising” the government about the impending catastrophic impact of anthropogenic climate change you’re already committing fraud.
This is what happens when there is no accountability.
“Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.”
– Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports
I think we’re seeing a pattern here. What would Cook and Lewandowsky make of this?
Lying for “the cause” is what nazis and commies did
A government employee involved in waste, fraud and abuse? Shocking.
Just try to fire one. Takes about a year or so
We’ll still be paying for this fraudster when he goes to club-fed. The AGW crowd and fraud seems to go hand-in-glove.
If he quickly admits to being the real Heartland document forger, they will drop the case.
OT
Organizations across the globe, including governments and independent research groups, have all endorsed the position that climate change is real – and is happening right now. Climate change science has been rigorously tested, retested and reviewed, and the answers always come out the same.
Of course, there will always be the occasional misstep. In 2007, Al Gore stated that Arctic summer ice could be long gone by 2013. Well, that’s hardly the case.
-Phillip Ross
http://www.ibtimes.com/why-did-reddit-ban-climate-change-deniers-commenting-their-science-forums-1511162
—————————————
I’ve heard of haughty deluded jerks, but this guy takes the grand prize.
#1 This sounds like those handicappers that use “computerized game simulations” to predict the outcome of a football game, but they still aren’t any better than a decent handicapper without computer simulations.
#2 Predicting an ice-free arctic and then being spectacualrly wrong is an occasional misstep to this guy, Phil.