Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
President Obama Unveils The Secret Ingredient Behind His Plan To End Billions Of Years Of Bad Weather
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Someone bled him?
Do leeches bleed?
Reblogged this on CraigM350.
I can’t hear a thing!
Drug reps try to sell physicians the same crap.
E.g. atypical antipsychotics control mood disorders, but drug reps minimize the idiosyncratic reactions, as well as the common result that patients get fat and diabetic on these meds.
Lesson: always be a science skeptic, especially where money is involved.
I’m not saying that these drugs suck, just that there is always pro and con, or a case for and against, risks and benefits, opportunity cost, trade-offs, etc.