Read the comments on this article. A few of the standard – “Goddard doesn’t know what he is talking about, but may be right about this one”
Arctic Ice: Midsummer Melt Update | Climate Denial Crock of the Week
Reading simple graphs is difficult for scientists.
COI | Centre for Ocean and Ice | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut
“Money For Nothing and your stats for free”
Thanks Heidi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAD6Obi7Cag
Heidi, please, “No More Lies” (Moody Blues)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KX5-9w1cx60
Better!
Is Heidi a meteorologist now?
If she put on a few more pounds, she could be Stephanie Abrams.
Climastrologist – according to CC:
Heidi Cullen – Chief Climatologist
Email: [email protected]
Dr. Heidi Cullen serves as Chief Clima[s]t[r]ologist for Climate Central — a non-profit [non-]science journalism organization headquartered in Princeton, NJ.
– – – –
Material between brackets ‘[]’ added by moi.
Meteorologist vs climastrologist – “What difference, at this point, does it make?”
– HRC
.
The afternoon radio talk show host had a mock interview with Hillary on her “plans” for the election – and every answer was that line.
Had to look her up; she doesn’t look near as stressed as Heidi looks in her pictures. Heidi looks like she’s carrying around some deep, dark tormenting secret …
Arctic Sea is easy to predict using the AMO data 90+% success rate..
https://twitter.com/NJSnowFan/status/491164231904280576/photo/1
…don’t forget, they consider 1 million km/sq ice free
It’s not the area, it’s the thickness.
Unless it’s thick. Then it’s the area.
If it has area and thickness then the algorithm is faulty.
If it has area and thickness then it is Heidi.
.
Heidi Cullen pics
.
vs
.
Stephanie Abrams pics
.
When Heidi smiles the room probably empties, everyone frightened of the horror. It’s horrific enough in a photo.
Yes … almost like the psychotic girlfriend, like – Samantha Powers even …
Stephanie has a much larger warm front.
When she has to resort to phrases like “deranged blogger”, we know she has lost the debate. The science is against her, the data are against her. All she has is her slobbering mouth….
Ever more people who are usually not involved in climate debates get this. One side is having a rational argument giving well founded reasons and the other is almost exclusively going berserk with doomsaying and ad hominem attacks and keeps lacking all real world evidence since years.
The funny part is that even if those climate augurs would be 100% right they still chose the near most idiotic mix of proposed remedies.
We’re a week and a half behind any hopes of setting a record open September Arctic ice this year. Only a low pressure cell entering the Arctic has any hopes of breaking up sufficient ice to increase the surface area subject to melt. As of today, no sign of it happening!!!
I got stuck on the pictures of Heidi Klum.
I noticed that in the comments at Climate Crocks they have moved the prediction of an ice free Arctic back to 2020. That seems in keeping with claims I have now seen in a couple of places saying, that if the “pause” in warming continues for 30 years, that might be a reason for reconsideration. Shame the US couldn’t move goalposts in that fashion in the World Cup competition.
The alarmists think there is a distinction between “The arctic will be ice free in 3 years” and “The arctic will be ice free in 6 years.”
The irony of alarmists using the “D” word continues, unabated.
you may wish to sign this uk e-petition http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/61879 asking the uk government to classify the terms “climate denier or variants thereof ” of as hate speech.
That’s very funny. Steve is deranged but probably right.
Heidi is stuck somewhere between levels 2 and 3. Meanwhile Steve is just shy of level 4. Two months to go…
These people are going to fall hard. So much mental commitment made to an ideology which is wrong, they just may lose their marbles. I can assure you, though, when in a few years time I see a poor tramp stumbling around the streets crying quietly to herself ‘its warming and we’re all going to diieeee’ I will be prepared to buy her a cup of hot soup and a nice, meaty, hamburger.
She doesn’t eat cow or pig, too much co2
Here we go again……Northwest passage being sailed for a “scientific” voyage to log the effects of global warming.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-28247175
https://www.facebook.com/BluePlanetOdyssey
I hope they’ve booked an icebreaker 🙂
I pity the poor kid on board…but she’s the grand-daughter of the ‘expedition’ leader..
Is this her?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fvl0ih_zDHU
and will she get through the worst
Steven I notice in your tweet you accuse Heidi of putting out “endless AGW propaganda”, surely that is wrong. Heidi only ever does ‘endless !!CAGW!! propaganda’.
🙂
And here I thought she belongs to THAT Cullen clan in Washington state…that sparkly, glowy one…
Arctic blah, blah, blah, ice is declining by 13.7% per decade, of course, we haven’t really been measuring it for long enough to know if that’s something to be alarmed about, but what the heck I’ll just throw it out there to push the agenda.
The data linked to by A. Watts says the minimum is decreasing by about 8.5% per decade. The maximum only by about 2.5% per decade.
http://www.theage.com.au/environment/weather/worst-of-winter-likely-over-as-warming-trend-begins-20140724-zw7wk.html here’s one to save for later lol my heater is on full blast!!!
Even the weather channel thought Heidi Cullen was too flaky and unstable.