Since the PDO shift in 1977, surface temperatures are increasing four times faster than 850-300 mb radiosonde temperatures.
Climate experts ignore this, because it doesn’t support the necessary propaganda required to keep funding flowing.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Engineering
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Engineering
- Ivan G Wainwright on Climate Engineering
- Russell Cook on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Bruce of Newcastle on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
The real greenhouse effect. Buildings that trap heat.
Downward flux is always greater – always (NASA proverb).
Steve
O/T but FYI
“Yonniestone
February 5, 2015 at 4:58 am · Reply
Obama is a tree expert, an Abhorist of growth that specializes in rooting countrees…..”
From comments at
http://joannenova.com.au/2015/02/write-to-a-tree-about-climate-change-in-the-melbourne-city-council-and-it-will-write-back/#comment-1677754
What will the tree say if I write to it on paper? Is that a hate crime?
+10
Obviously you will have to use reed paper. 🙂
What data is the blue line from?
And where is that GLCFS link meant to go to ?
The URL is munged for sure. It seems like it is supposed to go to http://www.glerl.noaa.gov but even that doesn’t make any sense.
No it does not.
There is this for Radiosonde Atmospheric Temperature Products:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/weather-balloon/radiosonde-atmospheric-temperature-products-accessing-climate
“Climate experts ignore this, because it doesn’t support the necessary propaganda required to keep funding flowing.”
I doubt climate experts in general possess merely one motivation. Some are probably true believers therefore dismiss any contrary evidence unconsciously. Others are probably too scared to not ignore inconvenient facts for fear of being ostracized and ridiculed. Others may just see the CAGW line as an easy way to get published and gain science “street cred”.
This plethora of motivations contributes to the unfortunate confluence of agendas that makes the entire CAGW “hoax” possible without much actual explicit collusion between individuals or groups.
Most people are followers not leaders. Keeping a roof over the head of your kids is going to be a big factor in how you deal with dishonesty and that is in every walk of life. Very very few have the actual option of standing up for the truth. Even Dr Tim Ball says he regrets taking the path he has taken because of the toll on his life and his family. (Mann’s lawsuit has beggared him as it was meant to.)
The federal government manufactures opinions on GW (or whatever cause benefits the feds) with grant money that is literally fresh off the printing presses. Disagree and find a new career. Fake dollars make a mockery of honest work. The federal government is at the root of what is wrong with modern America.
Remove the twistifications employed by the government climate scientists, and then correct for UHI and you get a world that is slightly cooler than the thirties. Not hotter. There is no way we are going to experience CAGW due to increasing CO2.
The only thing CO2 does is change how heat moves through the troposphere. Warmer lows at night and colder highs in the day. A win win for all but the neurotic morons among us.