Naomi Oreskes’ fascist propaganda flick has earned enough money to buy her a new Prius, assuming the movie didn’t cost anything to make, market or distribute. It is already the 10,313th most popular movie of all-time
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Engineering
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
Recent Comments
- Russell Cook on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Bruce of Newcastle on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
https://www.ted.com/talks/naomi_oreskes_why_we_should_believe_in_science?language=en LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztz3ZdPbdKo I TRUST THEM I BELIEVE LOOOOOOOOOOOL
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm I trust them on all these 😛
Brilliant!
Why did Sony consent to this sick fantasy of a documentary?
Seems to be an “autonomous division” within Sony Pictures.
http://www.sonyclassics.com/
“Michael Barker and Tom Bernard are co-presidents of Sony Pictures Classics—an autonomous division of Sony Pictures Entertainment founded in January 1992 (with Marcie Bloom) that distributes, produces and acquires independent films from the United States and around the world.”
ROTFLMAO!
I hope the backers lose their shirts on this propaganda piece.
Sad, I only know what the middle letters mean,–can guess at the others.
Looking forward to the sequel ‘Merchants of Doubtfire’ where a female historian, Oreskes, fools the world by impersonating a male megalomaniac. (Without any help from the makeup department)
Yeah, it wasn’t so convincing when she tried that fake mustache.
😉
http://a.fod4.com/images/user_photos/1352341/0e7314ef37e8895ada99d34491ee5ba4_fullsize.jpg
This is the funniest thing I have heard in a very long time.
Even the libtard warmista fascists know enough to not waste money on this steaming load of crap.
Why didn’t they get subsidies?
How do you know they didn’t?
Surely there would have been a financial disclosure statement. 😉
Naomi (and people like her) don’t believe in science, only propaganda.
More and more people are coming to the realization the modern science is junk science. When 80% of science experiments are not reproducible, something is wrong with science. (Would you buy a new car that only started 20% of the time.)
Even a liberal magazine like the New Yorker has come to that conclusion.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/12/13/the-truth-wears-off?currentPage=1
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0020124
“…..scientists find ways to confirm their preferred hypothesis, disregarding what they don’t want to see. Our beliefs are a form of blindness.” The New Yorker
Half of everything in print is false. Always has been, always will be. Net “knowledge” is always zero.
Hope she can get the Prius on sale after the theaters take their cut.
The distributor will get the vast majority of the money made by the movie. The agreement gives the distributor the agreed-upon percentage of the net box office or gross box office, whichever is greater. The way this works is amazing!
Consider this example. Theater A is negotiating with Distributor B over a new movie. The theater has figured that expenses, the nut, are about $4,500 per week. The net percentage to go to the distributor is set at 95 percent for the first two weeks, 90 percent for week three and 85 percent for the final week. The gross percentage to go to the distributor is set at 70 percent for the first two weeks, 60 percent for week three and 50 percent for the final week.
http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/movie-distribution2.htm
I’d like to have schadenfreude, but I bet none of the funding for the movie came from anyone who actually cares if the movie makes money or not. It’s probably funded by David Suzuki Foundation, Energy Foundation or Soros, who really just want to get the propaganda out.
Well I guess it’s not getting out. That’s something at least. 🙂
Look at it this way. That is at least a few million $$ down the tubes that can not be used to do damage elsewhere.
On a brighter note it sends the message that the masses are NOT INTERESTED.
Someone earlier to day had a UN poll with ~7 million people. Out of 14 ‘concerns’ CAGW came in dead last with very few voting for it. (Choose 12 out of 14 and rank them IIRC.)
LISTEN and BELIEVE
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/listen-and-believe?ref=image-entry-link