Propaganda – Not Science

It is easy to demonstrate that global warming experts are propagandists, not scientists. Check out this nonsense

ScreenHunter_7735 Mar. 06 00.12

On thin ice: Combined Arctic ice observations show decades of loss | UW Today

They carefully cherry picked the time frame misinform the audience, ending the study in 2012. Since the study ended, there has been a massive increase in old/thick ice. Had they ended the study at the current time, the results would have been quite different.

myi2011-2014 (1)

The starting point of 1975 is also chosen to deceive. The CIA reported a large increase in Arctic ice during the early 1970s. Had they started a few years earlier, the results would have been quite different.

PaintImage10991 (1)

CIA Report 1974

Let’s go back a little further to 1962 and compare the submarine pictures. The ice was much thinner in 1962 than 2001

ScreenHunter_265 Jul. 27 08.46

Seadragon (SSN-584), foreground, and her sister Skate (SSN-578) during a rendezvous at the North Pole in August 1962.

Now lets go back further to 1940. The ice was two meters thick, the same as now. There has been no change in Arctic ice thickness from 75 years ago.

ScreenHunter_7737 Mar. 06 00.25

23 Feb 1940 – THE NORTH POLE. Is it Getting Warmer. | BUNDABER…

There was a similar period of melting from 1910-1940 as from 1975-2012. It is cyclical, not linear.

ScreenHunter_107 Feb. 17 07.17

Papers Past — Auckland Star — 14 December 1940 — WARMER ARCTIC

The authors are intentionally deceiving the readers to lead them to exactly the wrong conclusion. This is Goebbels style propaganda, not science.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Propaganda – Not Science

  1. Ian Billing says:

    Global Warming? Not At the “World’s Longest Skating Rink”
    When it freezes over every winter, the Rideau Canal in Ottawa becomes “the world’s longest skating rink.” And this is the 55th straight day it’s been open to the public.
    That’s a record, says long time Ottawa resident Brian Lilley.
    The river normally thaws out at least once in a while during the season, rendering it unsafe for skating — but not this year.
    http://www.blazingcatfur.ca/2015/03/05/global-warming-not-at-the-worlds-longest-skating-rink/

  2. Eric Simpson says:

    Great work, Steven, exposing this obvious glaring bullshit!

    Of course I see this bs in the Google News headlines and I realize that the vast majority of human lemmings will just see the same thing and be swayed. Something has got to be done to counter this. We have to expose the MSM / warmist collusion on this. Inoculate the people against this. Because it is happening all the time and it makes our job of changing public opinion all but impossible.

    Btw, sunspots down to 31, and it’s looking real good for it to go even lower in a couple days, for more info here’s the space weather report. Current sun image: http://spaceweather.com/images2015/06mar15/hmi1898.gif

  3. ren says:

    Polar vortex accelerates due to the relatively strong solar wind. In March there will be more ice in the Arctic. The season is not finished yet.

  4. rah says:

    Anyone with a little bit of knowledge about the Arctic would know that over all the system is ever changing with significant changes happening frequently, sometimes over the course of a day or two. 2012 information is ancient history relative to the dynamic nature of the system.

  5. Sleepalot says:

    Steve, you recited propaganda about the bombing of Dresden.

    • rah says:

      A subject I’ve studied some. Got a link?

      • rah says:

        I must be missing something here! He merely brought to our attention the stupid propaganda of others and was not supporting it but criticizing it.

        BTW, a detail many seem to miss about that questionable bombings of that ancient city is that the it was carried out because at the Yalta conference Stalin asked for bombings of communications and transport centers to prevent shifting of German units to or about the Eastern Front. Judging the situation at the time it was deemed necessary to help prevent the shifting of German military assets and contrary to later claims, Dresden was a communications and transport center.

      • Sleepalot says:

        Let’s be fair here: I understand Steve was using Dresden as an example of truly-awful- things-that-happen as a contrast to the imaginary threat of CAGW, but his choice of
        Dresden (as opposed to say Warsaw, Stalingrad, Leningrad, Dachau, Nazi-occupation of the Ukraine, or the whole of the war) was the result of being exposed to propaganda, (Steve did a search for “Dresden bomb”) and the newspaper picture* he used for Dresden was itself propaganda.
        * I can’t see an accompanying article.
        http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/35985135?searchTerm=dresden%20bomb&searchLimits=

        • Gail Combs says:

          The propaganda is so pervasive that parts of it are accepted subconsciously by most of us even though we know we have been drenched in propaganda all our lives.

        • Sleepalot says:

          Test

        • Sleepalot says:

          @ Gail, yes, that’s true, but it’s no excuse. The Nazi’s were responsible for the bombing of Dresden, just as they were responsible for the other 70+ million deaths of WWII: only
          a Nazi sympathiser would suggest otherwise. I would like Steve to acknowledge that.

  6. DD More says:

    They carefully cherry picked the time frame misinform the audience, ending the study in 2012. Since the study ended, there has been a massive increase in old/thick ice. Had they ended the study at the current time, the results would have been quite different.

    Some researchers. A quick Bing scan got – The Arctic Report Card
    Highlights
    The September 2014 Arctic sea ice minimum extent was 5.02 million km2, slightly less than the 2013 minimum, but 1.61 million km2 greater than the record minimum of 2012. The sixth smallest ice extent of the satellite record (1979-2014) occurred in 2014.
    The coverage of multiyear ice in March 2014 increased to 31% of the ice cover from the previous year’s value of 22%.
    Satellite observations indicated an increase of mean thickness in the multi-year sea ice zone north-west of Greenland, from 1.97 m in March 2013 to 2.35 m in March 2014.
    http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/sea_ice.html

    Thats NOAA, so must be gospel.

  7. David G. says:

    Gail combs seems to be plagiarizing my posts!:) I just mentioned 1915, Morgan and the imposition of a semi official propaganda line over the top 179 news outlets, the other day in response to something here.. In this case it’s very good, isn’t it? I am dogged by warmers that totally dominate the climate conversation in San Francisco and in my own family!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *