The Current State Of Climate Science

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to The Current State Of Climate Science

  1. Gator says:

    “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

    Just part of their playbook.

    • RAH says:

      Call people names and run away or change the subject when you can’t win on the merits of an argument is also in their playbook.

      • ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N says:

        So you’ve met my ex.. or worse.. :)

        • arn says:

          There’s a reason why they try to feminize and emotionalise males.
          When they behave like spoiled,noisy,lottle girls they are no longer open for logical discussion.

  2. gregole says:

    It escapes me now, but who was the movie-maker clown that pulled the same stunt with Marc Morano a few years back? Yeah, he was another of these intellectual tough guys; his handlers got him alone and let him know Morano would tear him up. He quickly backed down; and funny I can’t readily find it on the internets…

    Looks like the same thing here. Carson, being in a bubble of his own ignorance, had no idea who he was dealing with and couldn’t imagine the thrashing Tony would have dealt him. Bastardi and I’m sure others clued him; so our hero beat a hasty, cowardly retreat with nothing to offer but libelous insults.

    Then there’s this:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZwuTo7zKM8

    • Gator says:

      I believe you are referring to James Cameron.

      • gregole says:

        Bingo! People’s names escape me. I thought it would just pop out on an internet search…the entire unseemly incident seems to have been “forgotten”.

    • neal s says:

      You might have better success searching with duckduckgo
      https://duckduckgo.com/?q=James+Cameron+Marc+Morano+debate&t=h_&ia=web

      I find it illuminating that if you compare the results from duckduckgo and google, that the google results are favorable to CAGW while the duckduckgo results are not skewed in this way.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      Yes, it was James Cameron. He imagined himself as some kind of metaphysical white hat gunfighter and bragged he would would defeat climate denial evil in an epic street shootout;

      ‘I want to call those deniers out into the street at high noon and shoot it out with those boneheads.’

      When Marc Morano challenged Cameron, he turned yellow and let his spokesman respond:

      ‘Morano is not at Cameron’s level to debate, and that’s why it didn’t happen. Cameron should be debating someone who is similar to his stature in our society.’

      James Cameron and Keith Carson. Pathetic little men.

      • RAH says:

        I would have taken up his shootout offer literally. You wanna use such language you better make sure you make it understood your speaking metaphorically.

      • Disillusioned says:

        ‘Morano is not at Cameron’s level to debate, and that’s why it didn’t happen.’

        Translation: Elitist Cameron quickly found out that Morano’s “level” is higher.

        ‘Cameron should be debating someone who is similar to his stature in our society.’

        Translation: He knew Morano was about to wipe the floor with him.

  3. u.k.(us) says:

    Kill shot of a reply, if I do say so myself.

  4. feathers says:

    Look at his facebook page. This guy is no scientist, he doesn’t even know the basic difference between causation and correlation. 30 seconds on his facebook page proves this. On facebook, he shows a map depicting lyme disease prevalence across the eastern half of the US and categorically states that this is due to “climate change”. Really? How about the increase in population which increases the human-animal interface (ie., causing a zoonotic bridge)? How about hunting laws that have allowed white tail populations to explode? How about improved diagnostic capabilities so many more clinicians are now looking to lyme in 2015 vs 1996?

    Tony, don’t waste your time on this fraud.

    • Gator says:

      They are all frauds!

      An old girlfriend of mine posted this on her Facebook page…

      “I used to think that top environmental problems were biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapse and climate change. I thought that thirty years of good science could address these problems. I was wrong. The top environmental problems are selfishness, greed and apathy, and to deal with these we need a cultural and spiritual transformation. And we scientists don’t know how to do that.”
      -Gus Speth

      Gus is not, and never has been a scientist! But being a flaky leftist, I guess he feels he can self identify as whatever he wishes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.