NASA has recently erased pre-1940 Arctic warming from the historical record, but navigational records from the time showed that the number of ice-free days in Spitsbergen tripled during that time.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
Recent Comments
- Chuck on Truth Or Consequences
- Gerald Machnee on Fifty Years Ago Today
- conrad ziefle on Fifty Years Ago Today
- Bob G on Truth Or Consequences
- Weylan McAnally on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- Bob G on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Ivan G Wainwright on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- conrad ziefle on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Bob G on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
Another inconvenient truth.
Lucky for the Russians or Churchill wouldn’t have been able to supply nearly as much material to Arkhangelsk to help fight the Nazis.
I was gonna be a smartarse and say Spitzbergen experienced a temporary continental drift south, however this is a data set that pokes another hole in the CAGW myth. As if there weren’t enough holes already. Nice one Steven.
The Spitsbergen navigation intervals line up nicely with Isfjord ,Svalbard raw temperature data (courtesy KNMI)