More On The NOAA June Fraud

NOAA says that June was the hottest month in Earth’s history, despite the fact that

  1. Satellite temperatures showed it wasn’t even close to hottest. NOAA failed to mention this in their press release, even though they are obviously aware of it.
  2. The amount of sea ice on Earth in June was the highest in decades
  3. Parts of Antarctica had their coldest June on record
  4. The Arctic north of 80N was below normal temperature every day in June, and was first or second coldest on record.

NOAA is attempting to defraud the public, and should be held accountable.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to More On The NOAA June Fraud

  1. D. Self says:

    When someone figures out how to hold the government accountable let me know. When over 1/2 the population is dumb as a brick and more keep coming it doesn’t look good.

  2. Abel Garcia says:

    That is because NOAA likes to use a FUDGE FACTOR!

  3. Harry says:

    You’re doing a great job don’t let up humiliating and exposing the warmists as liars.

  4. Andy Oz says:

    Like all government departments, political ferals succeed and drive out those who disagree with their ambition and political views. I’d say NOAA is no different. Going against the White House is probably bad for your career right now.

  5. Chewer says:

    NOAA is attempting to defraud the public, and should be held accountable.
    There doesn’t seem to be any chance of the criminals being held accountable with the Forth Estate in the bag for them.
    You and I didn’t elect our current leaders, the MSM did!

  6. Jeff says:

    The PDO in June of 1997 was +2.76 degrees (anomaly). June of 2014 was +0.82 degrees.

    That’s the entire Pacific Ocean. I’m calling BS. So it was nearly two degrees cooler in the pacific and was cooler in Arctic and in Antarctica. It was below normal in Australia and has been cold in North America.

    The Indian Ocean was be pretty hot right now.

  7. kirkmyers says:

    NOAA’s leadership will continue to engage in fraud until their junk science is exposed. They’ve been getting away with manipulating data for so long, there’s no incentive to tell the truth (which, at this point, would get them into big trouble).

    Someone on the inside needs to squeal. A single whistleblower would put an end to the AGW fairy tale.

  8. Spencer says:

    I cannot believe this kind of deception is going on. I’ve given & given the benefit of the doubt but there’s no way to slice this other than to say its flat out fraud!! What has happened to the U.S. that I used to know? And you wonder why folks have gov. conspiracy theories with JFK & 9/11. No…I do not by that mess but this is an example of why there is no trust or respect anymore for our government.

  9. QV says:

    One reason for 3 & 4 is possibly that NCDC/NOAA coverage of the poles is very limited.
    Also the difference between 2010 and 2014 is well within the margin of error so in reality they can’t be certain it was a record, even though they state with apparent certainty that it was:

    “This surpasses the previous record, set in 2010, by (0.05°F) 0.03°C. Nine of the ten warmest Junes on record have all occurred during the 21st century, including each of the past five years. The margin of error associated with this temperature is ±0.16°F (0.09°C). “

  10. anthonyvioli says:

    Not only is it hard to believe, its totally not believable full stop.

    It was hot no where! There is no spot around the globe in june that was way above average.

    Even more mind blowing is they try this stuff when its patently obvious to everyone with a brain that the earth is not warming one iota.

    In Austrlaia they wait for a scorching month, then do a huge press release declaring a new record etc etc..

  11. Cheshirered says:

    Corruption goes to the highest tip of the greasiest poles. Staggering that no government action / investigations are forthcoming.

    Their silence is deafening.

  12. Andrew says:

    I knew with a low temperature last night, Sunday June 20, of 59 degrees that NOAA was lying today. They know they are lying, a few in the media know it and don’t care to double check, but they are and they are bald facedly lying. We have them now.

  13. Jaget santos says:

    Wow dat source!
    Ah wait you don’t have a single one.

  14. Chip Bennett says:

    Let’s see:

    1. May was the hottest month in the history of EVER! (But the Great Lakes still had ice through the entire month.)

    2. June was EVEN HOTTER! (But most of us went most of the month without running our A/C.)

  15. The supposed warming is mostly due to NOAA “adjustments.”
    “He who controls the present controls the past.” – George Orwell, 1984.

  16. davidappell3 says:

    Not a single on of your claims passes even the slightest scrutiny:

    1. NOAA’s numbers were for the surface, which is not what satellites model.
    2. NOAA’s numbers were the global averate surface temperature, not sea ice.
    3. NOAA’s numbers were global averages, not just for Antarctica.
    4. NOAA’s numbers were global averages, not just for part of the Arctic.

    Ever hear the parable of the boy who cried fraud?

    • If you want to claim CO2 warming, you would want to look at trop temps, not UHI infected temps.

    • tom0mason says:

      Parable of the fraud called CO2 warming as propagated by davidappell3.

    • philjourdan says:

      The Stalker is back! Molested any children lately Davy?

    • DirkH says:

      NOAA’s numbers are crap. June was below average here in Germany. Only after NOAA’s announcement and the echo in the German media did the first warmist for 2 years crawl out of a hole and talked about Global Warming; all my Green colleagues were silent for 2 years. Well I told said warmist where to find RSS data; after giving him a short lecture of the lack of warming for the last 17 years (of which he had never heard; being clueless like all warmists).

    • geran says:

      David, should we put you down for the most hilarious troll of the month?

      Or, in your language, SHuousd we put you donrwn for the mist hilariimat troll for eeth month?

  17. pyeatte says:

    NOAA is bouncing off the walls trying to keep the fraud going.

  18. Lawrie Ayres says:

    Would the result be any different with the Republicans in charge? Will a Republican President sack the bureaucrats that run these agencies practicing fraud? In Australia we have a conservative PM but still the BoM and CSIRO continue their climate crap. No change yet, no one sacked, no audits.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *