Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
Recent Comments
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Peter Carroll on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- arn on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- mwhite on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- arn on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
18 Months Since Experts Predicted Global Warming Would Make California Wet
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
When will they learn? If a ‘scientist’ is making a climate prediction based upon a model, walk away, do not print. Climate models are worthless at predictions. A blindfolded monkey with darts would be more scientific, and would actually be right some of the time.
Hows about us regular folk just negate or invert every prediction made by the AGW folk?
No need, nature is already doing just that.
The key words are “should be assessed” which in plain English means send us more money for our next study.
I suspect that those fantasy computer generated models are more likely to get most researchers “hot and bothered”. Those researchers spend waaaaay to much time ogling their fantasy models.
Oh wait, we’re not talking about scantily clad animations?
Never mind. Carry on,.
See, this is where you deniers just don’t understand the science. They meant wet in the sexual connotation…
There’s probably a pretty good reason that there’s a desert in southern California for thousands of years. Sure there are frequent droughts, which would go unnoticed if the population of the state had not quadrupled in the past 50 years.
and THAT’S the bottom line. Too many people and too much irrigation to be supported by the natural state of that relatively arid land.
Unless you add nuclear power and salt water desalination plants.
Their models only missed by “that much” – Maxwell