97% of climate models are wrong. If it is indeed true that 97% of climate scientists trust climate models, that would indicate that 97% of climate scientists are idiots.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
- Protecting Endangered Species
- Record Climate Cynicism
- Record Cynicism
- The Latest In Climate Science Rhetoric
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
Recent Comments
- Bert on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- czechlist on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- Dan A Sinema on Climate Homicide
- MLH on Homophobic Gas
- Billyjack on Climate Homicide
- Laurie on Ivy Echo Chamber
Not that my current thought has a lot to do specifically with this post, but what the hell, here goes…
Paul Ehrlich’s statement that giving humanity a cheap, clean source of energy would be akin to giving an idiot child a machine gun makes a lot more sense when one looks at his paradigm of human behavior. Give the academics who share his world view a supercomputer and a high resolution temperature monitoring system, and they’re going to use it to their own ends, the truth be damned. When their predictions aren’t borne out by practical experience, they pile lies on top of faulty assumptions. God willing, they’re well on their way to completely discrediting themselves, all because they were handed the tools they wanted.
Giving a group of eggheads exactly what they think they want is, indeed, akin to giving an idiot child a machine gun.
Let’s put the idiot child with the machine gun in a room with them…
The NSA is watching……………………….
Why worry about that? I’m sure that scenario is already a level of some popular video game already… only far more graphic.
If it is indeed true that 97% of climate scientists trust climate models, that would indicate that 97% of climate scientists are idiots.
I don’t believe even 1% trust the models, but 97% use the models. Useful fictions from useful idiots.
“The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.”
– Dr David Frame,
climate modeler, Oxford University
100% of the 97% refuse to openly discuss or debate precise experimental data that show – beyond any reasonable doubt – the Sun’s pulsar core:
1. Made our chemical elements
2. Continues to make and discharge H and He
3. Birthed the solar system five billion years (5 Ga) ago
4. Sustained the origin and evolution of life after 3.5 Ga ago
5. Controls every atom, life and the climate of every planet in the solar system today, . . .
. . . a volume of space that has expanded over the past 5 Ga to be bigger than the combined volumes of 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 Earth’s.
Solar energy controls Earth’s climate: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy_For_Review.pdf
The graph for this story is quite kind to the global warmists. It doesn’t show their predictions as a hockey stick.
🙂
By the way, last night the BBC announced that the global warmists all predicted ‘the pause’.
🙂
After denying there was a ‘pause’ they now take credit for expecting it to happen? Classic 1984 style of rewriting the past. But then, they do this all the time, as you so eloquently proved, Steven.
Just like they have been busy erasing the Ice Age scare of the 1970s.
Those two history rewrites are enough to make anyone call
LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!
Or maybe that should be thermometer of fire…
https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/an_inconvenient_lighter.jpg
ems,
Did the Beeb by any chance explain the why of the “pause.” And, given it had to be at variance with their models, did they sat why to that?
All of them are probably not idiots. They are smart enough to spout the party line as long as money fills their pockets. The real useful idiots are the librulz down the food chain that gobble it up like pigs at the trough. No insult to swine intended.
Thanks for the links and information. I work with farmers who deal with real weather and put their own money at risk. They are very receptive to my message that AGW is complete BS. Now i have a chart to show that.
97% of the useful idiots in the Australian media who think they understand weather, let alone climate, publish rubbish like this end of the world story on ABC Rural. But the last 3 months rainfall anomaly shows a different story, as does the Australian drought map!! So who exactly is telling pork pies here? I think “Climastrologist” Blair Trewin should look before leaping into publishing erroneous climate hype.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-05/drought-worsens-in-northern-and-southern-australia-dry-february/6282428
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/rain/index.jsp?colour=colour&time=latest&step=0&map=anomaly&period=3month&area=nat
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/rain/index.jsp?colour=colour&time=latest&step=0&map=drought&period=cyear&area=nat
Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog.