During autumn 1958, The New York Times predicted both an ice-free Arctic and a new ice age.
They were wrong on all counts, just like they are now. The NYT morons have absolutely no idea what they are talking about.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
- The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist Speaks Out
- Startling New Revelation
- Just An Illusion
- Climate Conditioning
- Fact Checking Reuters
- No Correlation
- I Offended Their Religion
- The High Priest Has Forbidden Questioning His Religion
- Hiding And Rewriting History
- Fact-Free Economist
- Academic Tipping Points
- Desperate Academics
- Climate Misinformation
- Unreliable And Toxic
- Unreliable And Toxic
- Fossil Fuels To End Risotto
- HG Wells “CHANGES IN THE WORLD’S CLIMATE” 1920
- SCIENCE : THE ICE AGE COMETH?
- Climate Misinformation
- “Goodbye New York. Goodbye Washington”
- Climate Refugees
Recent Comments
- Nicholas McGinley on Michael Mann Again
- Laurie on Michael Mann Again
- Laurie on Michael Mann Again
- arn on Michael Mann Again
- arn on Michael Mann Again
- Russell Cook on Over The Target
- Disillusioned on The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist Speaks Out
- Timo, not that one! on Michael Mann Again
- Mac on Michael Mann Again
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Again
NYT: “All the news that’s print to fit”
The sunday times is good for when you paint walls. It’s actually cheaper than a tarp and covers 100 times the area. Just don’t read it.
Is the spirit of the Duchess will help dig out the Nazi train?
https://daisyvonpless.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/why-does-walbrzych-need-daisy-by-mateusz-mykytyszyn/
I started to write and had to go back to look at spelling. The Foundation to have the historical figure Princess Daisy help the Walbrzych community to come together to celebrate history and remember good works is a wonderful idea. I wish you and the partners will have much success. Perhaps others can help.
Project Riese.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1e/Komplex_Os%C3%B3wka_in_2014_%2815%29.JPG/800px-Komplex_Os%C3%B3wka_in_2014_%2815%29.JPG
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Riese
I work in the oil business and my fields have been reported on often. I can attest that reporters get virtually EVERY ‘fact’ about any technical story totally wrong every time. They as a group are among the most technically illiterate people on the planet.
Fraudulent climate scares are nothing new. Billions of Government dollars (our dollars!) behind them is what is new.
+1
We’ve had nutty professors and weirdo eggheads proclaiming this or that since there were professors and eggheads – read some history – it’s a long tradition. And quite a few sharpies and charlatans – perpetual motion anyone?
But public monies being hurled at goofy ideas dressed up as reasonable conjecture is new. It’s post modern. Face it. It’s hip; just ask Bill Maher or any other number of Hollywood wise men (women).
Most disturbing however, is that public policy in the form of taxation and regulation is being aggressively exercised in the name of climate-change / global warming. Concepts that exist only in pure conjecture and computer modeling – empirical measurements confirm none of it.
We live in interesting times.
Make that astonishing times.
It is also convenient how the environmental agenda interfaces so well with their socialist/communist agenda, which is basically to take total control of our lives and our wealth, what little we still have left.
Make that trillions of our tax dollars.