On this date in 1935, Forestburg, South Dakota was 104 degrees, compared to a forecast high of 68 degrees today. One hundred degree days used to be very common there, but they rarely happen anymore. In order to hide this cooling, criminals at NOAA and NASA massively tamper with the temperature data.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- Bob G on CO2²
- Bob G on CO2²
- conrad ziefle on CO2²
- arn on CO2²
- conrad ziefle on CO2²
- ThurmanZhou on CO2²
- Gordon Vigurs on CO2²
The 1930’s were truly astounding. How can they possibly claim there is catastrophic warming, when we can’t remotely approach the temperatures from 80 years ago?
I have personally examined in detail the actual temperature records from the 1930’s for many states. It is utterly delusional to claim it is currently as warm or warmer than it was back then.
I was in Rapid City, South Dakota on July 6th, 1973. Officially the temperature hit 110.8 degrees F. Some places around town reported 113 degrees. Whew!
That graph looks a lot like the summer temp series from the CAG page. (hope the link works)
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/us/39/0/tavg/3/8/1895-2015?base_prd=true&firstbaseyear=1901&lastbaseyear=2000&filter=true&filterType=binomial
Switching to Tmax really makes it obvious.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/us/39/0/tmax/3/8/1895-2015?base_prd=true&firstbaseyear=1901&lastbaseyear=2000&filter=true&filterType=binomial
Checking the adjustments http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/divisional-comparison/ made to the records from SD, even with the cooling of the past, it still shows up.
I have a theory.
CO2 and US Gun ownership show a much higher degree of correlation than does temperature.
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/11/gun-ownership-by-the-numbers-3058416.html
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11638-climate-myths-human-co2-emissions-are-too-tiny-to-matter/
The next step in my research is to determine whether CO2 causes Guns or Guns cause CO2.
We all know that correlation means causation. I know it sounds far fetched, but lets face it, its a better theory than the one Pope Obama and President Francis are proselytising.
🙂
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele,_North_Dakota
And yet, just 79 years later, further north, in North Dakota…….compared with….
http://www.weather.com/weather/monthly/l/58482:4:US
Really? What really is the difference?
74 degrees on that same date in 2015?
This is very torrid………
Arghhhhhhhhhhhhhh! The pain.the pain…….and, at lower carbon footprint…paranoia will get ya!!!!
Correction: 38 degrees difference……it was the Port Wine….forgive me