At NCDC, If The Present Refuses To Get Warmer – Then The Past Must Become Colder

8 Responses to At NCDC, If The Present Refuses To Get Warmer – Then The Past Must Become Colder

1. omanuel says:

   April 6, 2014 at 5:57 pm

   Thank you, Steven, for your humorous review of adjustments to temperature data from the US National Climate Data Center. Why do government scientists produce fraudulent data?

   NEUTRON REPULSION became a forbidden force of fragmentation after it destroyed Hiroshima on 6 Aug 1945 and Nagasaki on 9 Aug 1945 [1].

   FEAR of annihilation of the whole Earth convinced world leaders to
   1. Form the United Nations on 24 Oct 1945, and then
   2. Forbid knowledge after 1946 of energy in cores of
   _ a.) Heavy atoms like Uranium
   _ b.) Ordinary stars like the Sun !

   “Oh what a tangled web we weave
   When first we practice to deceive!”

   Reference:
   1. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf

   Reply
   • Robertv says:

     April 6, 2014 at 6:17 pm

     Why do government scientists produce fraudulent data?

     Money and Fear. The words ‘government scientists’ should already put all the alarm systems at work .
     Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.

     Reply
   • There Is No Substitute for Victory. says:

     April 7, 2014 at 6:17 am

     Omanuel, they commit fraud for the same reasons that in 1938 Germany claimed that the Chezs were abusing Ethnic Germans in the Sudetenland or news reels in late August 1939 reporting that Polish Forces had invaded German soil.

     Reply
     • omanuel says:

       April 7, 2014 at 9:55 pm

       Alarmists are afraid to openly discuss the experimental data that shows the Sun’s core is a pulsar that:

       1. Made our elements
       2. Birthed the solar system
       3. Sustained the origin and evolution of life

       Alarmist are trapped in a web of their own deceit and are now as dangerous as any cornered animal.

       Reply
   • Brian H says:

     April 10, 2014 at 6:11 am

     Thread bomber.

     Reply
2. Andy Oz says:

   April 7, 2014 at 12:25 am

   Do they keep all their data in a cold room to preserve it?

   Reply
   • BruceC says:

     April 7, 2014 at 8:08 am

     Speaking of cool-rooms Andy…the cool-room at the club I work at is a constant 4-5deg C…………..with a CO2 level between 650-750ppm. Go figure?

     Reply
     • Gail Combs says:

       April 7, 2014 at 9:04 am

       Bruce,
       Just tell everyone at the club to hold their breath and the CO2 levels will go down.

       Houses are often ~ 500 ppm or possibly more depending on the number of critters and how well sealed the building is.

       “CO2 is well mixed in the air” is one of the crooked legs that the CAGW hoax stands on.

       Dr. Jeffrey A. Glassman trashes that leg of the hoax HERE: ON WHY CO2 IS KNOWN NOT TO HAVE ACCUMULATED IN THE ATMOSPHERE & WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH CO2 IN THE MODERN ERA

       4. Sidebar: By losing its long residence time assumption, the Consensus finds its well-mixed conjecture invalidated. The admission in the TAR of CO2 gradients over the globe also contradicts its well-mixed claims. Independently, gradients must exist because of the highly concentrated outgassing of CO2 from equatorial waters, and the balancing concentrated polar uptakes. Consequently, the concentration of CO2 depends on where it is measured. Keeling himself warned not to mix CO2 measurements without regard to sinks and sources. He used calibration techniques to mix records. {Begin rev. 3/14/10} Recent results at 8 km from the AIRS (Atmospheric Infrared Sounder) satellite show dense clouds of CO2 emerging from below. This should be just one more nail in the coffin for the well-mixed/long-lived assumption. See RSJ response to James Daniel, 6/17/09, IPCC’s Fatal Errors ; RSJ response to David, 8/24/08, The Acquittal of Carbon Dioxide . {End rev. 3/14/10}.

       Glassman’s first paper on CO2: The Acquittal of Carbon Dioxide

       Reply