Thousands Of Papers Denying Climate Change

Apparently thousands of scientists believe that the climate never used to change.

Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 4.02.15 AM

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Thousands Of Papers Denying Climate Change

  1. wert says:

    Ben thinks climate change == anthropogenic global warming. You think climate change is a change in climate.

    • Gail Combs says:

      The progressives have done their usual trick of confusing the issue by redefining the term, just like they redefined Liberal to mean the opposite of Classic Liberal. They have to continually grab new words with a positive connotation as their slime sticks heavily to the older words making them useless in their psy-ops.. This is what they are doing to the words science, scientist and NASA as well as climate change.

      Climate Change
      Here’s the official definition:

      “Climate change” means a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods.

      That’s from the official UN Framework Convention on Climate Change http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/background/items/2536.php
      . or
      https://web.archive.org/web/20140913102734/http://unfccc.int/files/documentation/text/html/list_search.php?what=keywords&val=&valan=a&anf=84&id=10

      The term specifically excludes all natural climate change, and even excludes any caused by humans due to, for example, land clearance or city building, considering only atmospheric changes.

      The IPCC does NOT exist to summarise climate science and it does not.

      The IPCC is only permitted to say AGW is a significant problem because they are tasked to accept that there is a “risk of human-induced climate change” which requires “options for adaptation and mitigation” that can be selected as political polices and the IPCC is tasked to provide those “options”.

      This is clearly stated in the “Principles” which govern the work of the IPCC. These are stated at
      http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ipcc-principles/ipcc-principles.pdf

      Near its beginning that document says

      ROLE

      2. The role of the IPCC is to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation. IPCC reports should be neutral with respect to policy, although they may need to deal objectively with scientific, technical and socio-economic factors relevant to the application of particular policies.

      This says the IPCC exists to provide
      (a) “information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change”
      and
      (b) “options for adaptation and mitigation” which pertain to “the application of particular policies”.

      Hence, its “Role” demands that the IPCC accepts as a given that there is a “risk of human-induced climate change” which requires “options for adaptation and mitigation” which pertain to “the application of particular policies”. Any ‘science’ which fails to support that political purpose is ‘amended’ in furtherance of the IPCC’s Role.

      This is achieved by amendment of the IPCC’s so-called ‘scientific’ Reports to fulfil the IPCC’s political purpose by politicians approving the SPM then the IPCC lead Authors amending the so-called ‘scientific’ Reports to agree with the SPM.

      All IPCC Reports including the IPCC AR5 are pure pseudoscience intended to provide information to justify political actions; i.e.Lysenkoism.

  2. gator69 says:

    I thought Lorne Green was dead.

  3. Gail Combs says:

    Lorne Greene “The son of Jewish immigrants from the Soviet Union, Greene was born February 12, 1915, in Ottawa, Canada. (He died September 11, 1987, at age 72.) To celebrate his centennial, we rounded up some intriguing factoids about the late, great actor…” A favorite show of mine as a kid. I even have a pony named for the characters in that show.

    Dan Blocker — Hoss’s horse was Chub, a half-thoroughbred, half-quarterhorse that stood 15.3 hands high and tipped the scales at 1,250 pound. That is one hefty horse!

  4. Sunsettommy says:

    Ben, is a liar since there are no such number of papers he claims to have read.Most of the modeled CAGW baloney comes from a very small circle of warmists charlatans.

  5. Bruce D'Amours says:

    Thousands? Never mind the obvious fact that Ben is not even paying attention to what you are saying; I’d like to see the list of the “thousands” of papers he’s read. I’m sure he added at least 1 zero (and probably 2) to that figure. (Unless, in spite of his apparent youth, he’s a long-tenured professor of some earth related science).

  6. PhilJourdan says:

    Parrots – they only know what they have been taught to say.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.