On March 19, 1907 – three HCN stations in Oklahoma were over 100 degrees. If this happened now, climate experts would cite it as 100% proof of global warming, and James Hansen would say it couldn’t have happened below 350 PPM CO2.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
- Fort Lauderdale Drowning
- Sinking Of The Titanic
Recent Comments
- czechlist on “The Hour Of Decision”
- Trevor on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Trevor on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- arn on Technology Advances
- Billyjack on “The Hour Of Decision”
- arn on “fair & equitable”
- arn on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Bob G on “fair & equitable”
- Bob G on Michael Mann Continues His War
- arn on Michael Mann Continues His War
Steve, you should switch to Centigrades since below 0 means cold and above zero warmer. Further from zero is either much warmer or much colder and this is why the chemistry uses C as a standard – you either have to cool reaction or warm it.
Washington, DC also set their all-time March record during 1907, 93 degrees. With National Airport so hot biased, if it were to happen now, it woud probably be 98.
Reblogged this on Help save our kids future.
Steve, you remind me of Haidt’s finding that conservatives find it easy to predict what liberals will do or say, but liberals are generally wildly wrong about conservatives, because they depend on stereotypes and caricatures. Fundamentally, liberals have only 2 values (fairness and avoiding harm), while conservatives have those and about 4 more, so they can easily predict the sub-set.